Can the West Survive Trump? By Andrew Sullivan
June 2, 2017
9:11 am
The gnawingly persistent question in the Trump years so far is a relatively simple one: Is this reparable? By which I mean: Can Trumps admixture of malevolence, corruption, and incompetence be survived without permanent damage? Is this a minor heart attack from which this democracy and the world can soon recover
or is it a major one whose consequences are, in some respects, permanent?
The truth is: We dont yet know (although Trumps withdrawal from the Paris climate accord is beyond depressing). Can we at some point reconstruct a common set of facts after such a shameless torrent of lies and fantasies from the very top? Can some minimal level of decency and dignity be returned to the White House and to our public discourse? Is there any viable synthesis to be struck between the two Americas divided by a widening gyre of mutual incomprehension? The long run suggests all of this is possible, if currently hard to envision. Time heals. America survived the 1860s and the 1960s. But theres one thing about todays political darkness that will be close to impossible to undo.
And thats the very concept of a united, democratic West. It emerged out of the ashes of the Second World War, bringing similar democracies together across the Atlantic in opposition to totalitarianism in all its forms. At its center was Germany as a free, democratic, peaceful, and unified country. It was a triumph primarily of the United States, cemented in place in due course by NATO and the European Union. This Euro-American axis kept the peace, created unparalleled prosperity for both continents, and defeated the Soviet Union peacefully before it kept post-Soviet Russias great power meddling in check. How often in history has a conquering power turned around and rebuilt and defended and protected the country it defeated and occupied? How often has it then sustained that core assurance for decades?
And in a few months, Trump has all but trashed it. NATOs Article 5 the rock-solid assurance that an attack on any alliance member will be treated as an attack on all was always the linchpin, and its credibility, especially with the Russians, was essential. Every single American president has therefore immediately, reflexively, emphatically reaffirmed it. And yet Trump pointedly and pettily refused to last week even though an explicit assurance was apparently in the original text of his speech, and even though Mattis, McMaster, et al. know perfectly well why it is indispensable. Without this unquestioned trust, a defensive alliance falls apart. Yes, there is a real question of the European commitment to defense spending and Trump had every right to bring that up. But by threatening to withhold military support without such an increase in spending, Trump turned an alliance into a protection racket. Such rackets depend on fear, not trust. He effectively in a fit of apparent pique threw away the work and lives of generations like a child tosses a toy from a bassinet.
more
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/06/can-the-west-survive-trump.html
apcalc
(4,465 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)there will be some more laws enacted to prevent some of the difficulty we are currently facing. Hopefully full financial disclosure with tax returns. Also a requirement for the president and other members be required to place any business holdings into a a blind trust and not the "blind trust" trump says he has. We are a strong nation, it would be nice for Congress to step up and put country first and party down the line.
murielm99
(30,736 posts)after Nixon. I think there will be many more reforms if the world survives trump.
world wide wally
(21,742 posts)If the American people vote the other way, it is over... and I for one don't want to be a part of it.