Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Despite Disavowals, Leading Tech Companies Help Extremist Sites Monetize Hate
Retweeted by David Fahrenthold: https://twitter.com/Fahrenthold
Btw, this is the story that caused trolls to attack our emails.
It's a good story. You should share it.
Link to tweet
Despite Disavowals, Leading Tech Companies Help Extremist Sites Monetize Hate
Most tech companies have policies against working with hate websites. Yet a ProPublica survey found that PayPal, Stripe, Newsmax and others help keep more than half of the most-visited extremist sites in business.
By Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Madeleine Varner and Lauren Kirchner, Aug. 19, 2017, 1:45 p.m.
Because of its extreme hostility toward Muslims, the website Jihadwatch.org is considered an active hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League. The views of the sites director, Robert Spencer, on Islam led the British Home Office to ban him from entering the country in 2013. ... But its designation as a hate site hasnt stopped tech companies including PayPal, Amazon and Newsmax from maintaining partnerships with Jihad Watch that help to sustain it financially. PayPal facilitates donations to the site. Newsmax the online news network run by President Donald Trumps close friend Chris Ruddy pays Jihad Watch in return for users clicking on its headlines. Until recently, Amazon allowed Jihad Watch to participate in a program that promised a cut of any book sales that the site generated. All three companies have policies that say they dont do business with hate groups.
Jihad Watch is one of many sites that monetize their extremist views through relationships with technology companies. ProPublica surveyed the most visited websites of groups designated as extremist by either the SPLC or the Anti-Defamation League. We found that more than half of them 39 out of 69 made money from ads, donations or other revenue streams facilitated by technology companies. At least 10 tech companies played a role directly or indirectly in supporting these sites.
Traditionally, tech companies have justified such relationships by contending that its not their role to censor the Internet or to discourage legitimate political expression. Also, their management wasnt necessarily aware that they were doing business with hate sites because tech services tend to be automated and based on algorithms tied to demographics.
In the wake of last weeks violent protest by alt-right groups in Charlottesville, more tech companies have disavowed relationships with extremist groups. During just the last week, six of the sites on our list were shut down. Even the web services company Cloudflare, which had long defended its laissez-faire approach to political expression, finally ended its relationship with the neo-Nazi site The Daily Stormer last week.
....
Like this story? Sign up for our daily newsletter to get more of our best work.
Julia Angwin is a senior reporter at ProPublica. From 2000 to 2013, she was a reporter at The Wall Street Journal, where she led a privacy investigative team that was a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize in Explanatory Reporting in 2011 and won a Gerald Loeb Award in 2010.
https://twitter.com/JuliaAngwin
Lauren Kirchner is a senior reporting fellow at ProPublica.
https://twitter.com/lkirchner
Jeff Larson is a reporter at ProPublica.
https://twitter.com/thejefflarson
Most tech companies have policies against working with hate websites. Yet a ProPublica survey found that PayPal, Stripe, Newsmax and others help keep more than half of the most-visited extremist sites in business.
By Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Madeleine Varner and Lauren Kirchner, Aug. 19, 2017, 1:45 p.m.
Because of its extreme hostility toward Muslims, the website Jihadwatch.org is considered an active hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League. The views of the sites director, Robert Spencer, on Islam led the British Home Office to ban him from entering the country in 2013. ... But its designation as a hate site hasnt stopped tech companies including PayPal, Amazon and Newsmax from maintaining partnerships with Jihad Watch that help to sustain it financially. PayPal facilitates donations to the site. Newsmax the online news network run by President Donald Trumps close friend Chris Ruddy pays Jihad Watch in return for users clicking on its headlines. Until recently, Amazon allowed Jihad Watch to participate in a program that promised a cut of any book sales that the site generated. All three companies have policies that say they dont do business with hate groups.
Jihad Watch is one of many sites that monetize their extremist views through relationships with technology companies. ProPublica surveyed the most visited websites of groups designated as extremist by either the SPLC or the Anti-Defamation League. We found that more than half of them 39 out of 69 made money from ads, donations or other revenue streams facilitated by technology companies. At least 10 tech companies played a role directly or indirectly in supporting these sites.
Traditionally, tech companies have justified such relationships by contending that its not their role to censor the Internet or to discourage legitimate political expression. Also, their management wasnt necessarily aware that they were doing business with hate sites because tech services tend to be automated and based on algorithms tied to demographics.
In the wake of last weeks violent protest by alt-right groups in Charlottesville, more tech companies have disavowed relationships with extremist groups. During just the last week, six of the sites on our list were shut down. Even the web services company Cloudflare, which had long defended its laissez-faire approach to political expression, finally ended its relationship with the neo-Nazi site The Daily Stormer last week.
....
Like this story? Sign up for our daily newsletter to get more of our best work.
Julia Angwin is a senior reporter at ProPublica. From 2000 to 2013, she was a reporter at The Wall Street Journal, where she led a privacy investigative team that was a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize in Explanatory Reporting in 2011 and won a Gerald Loeb Award in 2010.
https://twitter.com/JuliaAngwin
Lauren Kirchner is a senior reporting fellow at ProPublica.
https://twitter.com/lkirchner
Jeff Larson is a reporter at ProPublica.
https://twitter.com/thejefflarson
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2297 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Despite Disavowals, Leading Tech Companies Help Extremist Sites Monetize Hate (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2017
OP
Made new OP in General: Despite Disavowals, Leading Tech Companies Help Extremist Sites Monetize Hat
Madam45for2923
Aug 2017
#4
dalton99a
(81,468 posts)1. Kick.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)2. Needs to be read & bookmarked.
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)3. Kicking!
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)4. Made new OP in General: Despite Disavowals, Leading Tech Companies Help Extremist Sites Monetize Hat
Despite Disavowals, Leading Tech Companies Help Extremist Sites Monetize Hate
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029512295