One Year After Women's March, More Activism but Less Unity

[niyad]

One Year After Women's March, More Activism but Less Unity

Women’s March Inc., which organized the event in
Washington, has encouraged more protests. But a new
group is focused on winning elections, especially in red states.



Amber Selman-Lynn wanted to help plan a women’s march in Mobile, Ala., this month to mark the first anniversary of last year’s huge protests across the country. The day had been significant for her. With no experience in political activism, she had helped organize a bus full of women to go from Mobile to Washington. After they came back from the euphoric trip, they formed a group called Mobile Marchers that met monthly. They spoke up for the Affordable Care Act at town-hall-style meetings, and knocked on doors for the Alabama Senate candidate Doug Jones, the Democrat who beat Roy S. Moore in a stunning victory last month.

But when Ms. Selman-Lynn tried to register her anniversary event on the website for Women’s March Inc., the high-profile group formed by the organizers of last year’s event in Washington, she received an unusual letter. It said that while the group was “supportive of any efforts to build our collective power as women,” it asked that she “not advertise your event as a ‘Women’s March’ action.” “It’s kind of silly,” Ms. Selman-Lynn said. “We are clearly the women’s march in Mobile.”

The Women’s March a year ago aimed to start a movement of women from all walks of life who would continue their activism long after they had gone home. In many ways, that goal has been realized. In the wake of the march on Washington — and simultaneous marches in more than 600 towns and cities across the country — thousands of women threw themselves into activism for the first time in their lives, especially in red states where the events provided a rare chance to build a network of like-minded people. In Texas, emails collected by the organizers of the Women’s March in Austin are being re-purposed to promote candidates who support abortion rights. In Arkansas, Gwen Combs, the elementary schoolteacher who organized the Little Rock march, is now running for Congress. Thousands of women in October attended a convention in Detroit training them on everything from lobbying elected officials to confronting white supremacy.

But as the movement evolves, differing priorities and tactics have emerged among the women, nearly all of them unpaid and spread across the country. Now, on the eve of the anniversary, a rift is emerging between two groups: Women’s March Inc., which organized the march on Washington and spent much of the year creating more social justice protests, and another organization of activists who planned sister marches last year and believe that winning elections, particularly in red states, should be the primary goal. The split has raised questions about who can claim the mantle of the Women’s March — and the funding and press attention that goes with it.

. . . .

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/15/us/womens-march-anniversary.html

[LisaM]

1. The organizers last year were super divisive

They kept their agenda under wraps but we all recall how they purposely (and nastily) kept Hillary off the list of women they intended to honor. They pulled the same garbage at their Women's Conference in Detroit last year

I know that many people turned out last year despite, not because of, the organizers. Sounds as if they are up to their old tricks.

[niyad]

2. it is depressing, to say the least. all that talk of "branding"--sounds like an ad company, I was,

quite frankly, appalled.

[DURHAM D]

3. First step: remove grifter Linda Sarsour. nt

[LisaM]

4. Yes, she seems to be front and center of the problem.

I was appalled last year by their treatment of Hillary; however, I knew that many, many marchers were basically ignoring the organizers of the DC march and having more loosely organized and impromptu marches in their cities. I went and I enjoyed it and will always remember it, and frankly, it was the spontaneous nature of it that appealed to me rather than any program they'd set up.

They had a way to message the people who organized it last year. I messaged them several times asking them to add Hillary to the list of honorees and the responses were ridiculous, they completely ignored that question (several times) and kept offering logistical information instead.

I think the pussy hats also sprang up organically and weren't affiliated with the organizers at all.

[question everything]

5. And they kept Jewish women from LGBT march in Chicago, as Sarsour is anti-Israel

https://www.democraticunderground.com/12232880

https://www.democraticunderground.com/12232944

[Blue_Tires]

7. +1

[BigmanPigman]

6. Thanks for posting. I started to read the article late last night

and after 12 seconds the NYT blocked my view since I used up all my free reads for the month.

This year's marches are themed "Power To The Polls" and "Hear Our Vote" which seems to be a focus of getting people registered to vote and GOTV.

https://www.womensmarch.com/mission
This lists their "mission" for the 2018 March and addresses many issues however, from immigrants' rights, to environmental rights, to worker's rights, reproductive rights, etc.