Republicans can win elections. But they can't govern. - WaPo Editorial Board
By Editorial Board January 20 at 11:20 AM
THE GOVERNMENT shut down at 12:01 a.m. Saturday. The immediate cause was Senate Democrats refusing to go along with another short-term federal funding extension, and Congress stayed in Washington Saturday in hopes of making the shutdown short-lived. But the underlying problem is GOP dysfunction in both branches of government. This is the first time the government has ever shut down while one party controlled Congress and the White House. Republicans can win elections but they cannot govern effectively.
The impasse centers on two issues that Congress should have solved months ago. First is the fate of the dreamers immigrants brought to the country illegally when they were children who know the United States as their only home and have integrated into American society. The second is the funding-starved Childrens Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which ensures that low-income families can get care for their children. Providing legal protections to the dreamers and re-upping CHIP both command overwhelming support from the public and their representatives in Congress. If congressional leaders had allowed simple up-or-down votes on these questions, lawmakers would have passed mainstream solutions, easily. But they practically ignored CHIPs funding crisis for months. They also declined to bring a dreamers bill to a vote. This reflected GOP congressional leaders spineless practice of suppressing legislation that a majority of Congress supports, in counterproductive deference to their right wing.
After months of inaction, Democrats were understandably incensed. President Trump could have brokered a deal. In fact, he appeared ready to do so earlier this month, when he promised to sign a bipartisan compromise bill on the dreamers, if one were negotiated, and to take the heat for doing so. A bipartisan group presented a plan that would have given immigration hard-liners several concessions in return for a dreamers fix. Yet, Mr. Trump betrayed his promise, suddenly siding with the hard-liners who demanded a long list of policy changes in return for extending dreamer protections.
The House offered to extend CHIP funding for six years. But as it became clearer that Democrats were serious about holding up government funding until Congress finally addressed both the dreamers and CHIP, Mr. Trump should have bargained. Instead, even Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) complained that the presidents position was unclear. Just hours before federal funding expired, Marc Short, Mr. Trumps legislative director, insisted that the White House had already offered its plan which was no compromise at all. In other words, the hard-liners were in control and the president would not compromise despite his past insistence that he wanted a bipartisan bill to sign.
If GOP leaders had allowed the majority of Congress to work its will, the shutdown might have been avoided. If, when that did not happen, the president had negotiated in good faith, the government would still be open. Forcing a shutdown is a drastic legislative act that should not be welcomed. But neither should Republicans unreason and inconsistency. This is no way to run a country.
###
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/republicans-can-win-elections-but-they-cant-govern/2018/01/20/79beba98-fd42-11e7-a46b-a3614530bd87_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-a%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.0420ce006af2
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)... that getting Republicans out of it won't fix.
===============
gopiscrap
(23,759 posts)the repukes have not won a national election with out cheating or dirty tricks since 1956 Eisenhower was the last legitimately elected republican president
DAMANgoldberg
(1,278 posts)to be said far and wide. The Republican problem didn't start with Trump, but I hope and pray that it will end with him and his party as we know it.
I'm not naive to think that everyone would agree with how I think this country and world should be wrong, but really want an informed and reasonable opposition that is ultimately instinctively committed to the notion of America as a great important nation that will lead the world in proper fashion.
Though I will probably never be rich financially, I don't hate on folks that earned their money and are indifferent to those that didn't. However, there is enough to go around, and you can't take it with you. How much is too much? is the question that comes to mind. Solid answers from TPTB would be appreciated.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Ours is a liberal democratic republic -- government, of, by and for the people.
Most conservative personalities are not genetically wired to want or believe in government that gives that kind of responsibility and freedom to everyone. Conservative forms of government tend to be authoritarian, centralized into one strong leadership, and have tiered, socioeconomic structures cementing in inequality as a necessary virtue. That is what they want and need.
So of course when they get in office they do not govern according to the liberal principles of our Declaration of Independence and Constitution. And people who do not understand or believe in what they are supposed to do not only tend to be incompetent without strong guidance, but prone to corruption.
When people show you who they are, believe them. And, boy, are they showing!
J_William_Ryan
(1,753 posts)the consequence of fear, ignorance, demagoguery, and gerrymandering their election victories as devoid of merit as their political agenda.