Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Sinclair forces pro-Trump propaganda
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2018/03/05/there-no-audience-boris-epshteyns-pro-trump-propaganda-so-sinclair-forces-it-people/219554There is no audience for Boris Epshteyn's pro-Trump propaganda, so Sinclair forces it on people
For nearly a year now, Sinclair Broadcast Group has been mandating that its local news stations air commentary segments from former Trump aide Boris Epshteyn. Its essentially force-feeding local audiences Trump propaganda between community news and weather -- and the numbers show no one would watch it otherwise.
Sinclair is a corporate giant that owns or operates around 190 local TV news stations across the country, and its been quietly forcing its stations to air nationally produced right-wing spin for years. But when it hired Epshteyn, fresh from a stint in the Trump administration, to serve as its chief political analyst, it was only a matter of time before everyone was paying attention. Numerous media and business reporters highlighted Sinclairs twofold plan for growing local right-wing news: using the companys still-pending acquisition of Tribune Media stations to further expand its reach across the country (with its potentially unethical relationship with the Trump administration and its appointees paving the way), and hiring Epshteyn as a new, Trump-aligned star for must-run national segments.
[...]
Sinclair is forcibly creating an audience where none exists by requiring its news stations to air Epshteyns segments. Even though only about 25 to 50 people seem to care about his commentary enough to seek it out on YouTube, its still reaching about 39 percent of U.S. TV households -- and could soon reach an unprecedented 72 percent.
[...]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1193 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sinclair forces pro-Trump propaganda (Original Post)
Hermit-The-Prog
Mar 2018
OP
BigmanPigman
(51,590 posts)1. Fox Ruse Sinclair, Circa...PROPAGANDA!
We are in authoritarian territory here.
rainin
(3,011 posts)2. I wish we knew how to stop this.
We used to have laws that limited the reach of single media owners. Now, any mention of regulations results in First Amendment arguments. This seems even more important that gun control. In fact, if media were publicly owned and regulated, then we wouldn't have trouble passing legislation that 95% of Americans actually support.
Phoenix61
(17,003 posts)3. Monopolies were made to be broken.
Just because it's happening now doesn't mean it will survive past this administration.