Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
These 1950s experiments showed us the trauma of parent-child separation. Now experts say they're too
These 1950s experiments showed us the trauma of parent-child separation. Now experts say they're too unethical to repeateven on monkeys.
A childhood without affection can be devastating, even if basic needs are met.
John Glucks excitement about studying parent-child separation quickly soured. Hed been thrilled to arrive at the University of Wisconsin at Madison in the late 1960s, his spot in the lab of renowned behavioral psychologist Harry Harlow secure. Harlow had cemented his legacy more than a decade earlier when his experiments showed the devastating effects of broken parent-child bonds in rhesus monkeys. As a graduate student researcher, Gluck would use Harlows monkey colony to study the impact of such disruption on intellectual ability.
Gluck found academic success, and stayed in touch with Harlow long after graduation. His mentor even sent Gluck monkeys to use in his own laboratory. But in the three years Gluck spent with Harlowand the subsequent three decades he spent as a leading animal researcher in his own righthis concern for the well-being of his former test subjects overshadowed his enthusiasm for animal research.
Separating parent and child, hed decided, produced effects too cruel to inflict on monkeys.
Since the 1990s, Glucks focus has been on bioethics; hes written research papers and even a book about the ramifications of conducting research on primates. Along the way, he has argued that continued lab experiments testing the effects of separation on monkeys are unethical. Many of his peers, from biology to psychology, agree. And while the rationale for discontinuing such testing has many factors, one reason stands out. The fundamental questions we had about parent-child separation, Gluck says, were answered long ago.
https://www.popsci.com/1950s-experiments-attachment-unethical?src=SOC&dom=tw
A childhood without affection can be devastating, even if basic needs are met.
John Glucks excitement about studying parent-child separation quickly soured. Hed been thrilled to arrive at the University of Wisconsin at Madison in the late 1960s, his spot in the lab of renowned behavioral psychologist Harry Harlow secure. Harlow had cemented his legacy more than a decade earlier when his experiments showed the devastating effects of broken parent-child bonds in rhesus monkeys. As a graduate student researcher, Gluck would use Harlows monkey colony to study the impact of such disruption on intellectual ability.
Gluck found academic success, and stayed in touch with Harlow long after graduation. His mentor even sent Gluck monkeys to use in his own laboratory. But in the three years Gluck spent with Harlowand the subsequent three decades he spent as a leading animal researcher in his own righthis concern for the well-being of his former test subjects overshadowed his enthusiasm for animal research.
Separating parent and child, hed decided, produced effects too cruel to inflict on monkeys.
Since the 1990s, Glucks focus has been on bioethics; hes written research papers and even a book about the ramifications of conducting research on primates. Along the way, he has argued that continued lab experiments testing the effects of separation on monkeys are unethical. Many of his peers, from biology to psychology, agree. And while the rationale for discontinuing such testing has many factors, one reason stands out. The fundamental questions we had about parent-child separation, Gluck says, were answered long ago.
https://www.popsci.com/1950s-experiments-attachment-unethical?src=SOC&dom=tw
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 6515 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (36)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
These 1950s experiments showed us the trauma of parent-child separation. Now experts say they're too (Original Post)
demmiblue
Aug 2018
OP
BigmanPigman
(51,588 posts)1. I watched a nature show about chimps and will always be heartbroken
over it. In a jungle by a stream a mother chimp died and all of the other chimps in their group came to where her body was and they all stayed and mourned her death for a few days. However, her child, a full grown chimp, was so devastated that he built a hammock in the trees above her dead body and stayed there for three weeks until he finally died too. Their parent-child bonds are very, very strong.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)2. Send this to the Democratic leaders
Maybe they'll get as mad as they should be.
dchill
(38,474 posts)3. "...too unethical to repeat."
"...answered long ago."