Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,845 posts)
Sat Aug 11, 2018, 02:14 PM Aug 2018

These 1950s experiments showed us the trauma of parent-child separation. Now experts say they're too

These 1950s experiments showed us the trauma of parent-child separation. Now experts say they're too unethical to repeat—even on monkeys.

A childhood without affection can be devastating, even if basic needs are met.

John Gluck’s excitement about studying parent-child separation quickly soured. He’d been thrilled to arrive at the University of Wisconsin at Madison in the late 1960s, his spot in the lab of renowned behavioral psychologist Harry Harlow secure. Harlow had cemented his legacy more than a decade earlier when his experiments showed the devastating effects of broken parent-child bonds in rhesus monkeys. As a graduate student researcher, Gluck would use Harlow’s monkey colony to study the impact of such disruption on intellectual ability.

Gluck found academic success, and stayed in touch with Harlow long after graduation. His mentor even sent Gluck monkeys to use in his own laboratory. But in the three years Gluck spent with Harlow—and the subsequent three decades he spent as a leading animal researcher in his own right—his concern for the well-being of his former test subjects overshadowed his enthusiasm for animal research.

Separating parent and child, he’d decided, produced effects too cruel to inflict on monkeys.

Since the 1990s, Gluck’s focus has been on bioethics; he’s written research papers and even a book about the ramifications of conducting research on primates. Along the way, he has argued that continued lab experiments testing the effects of separation on monkeys are unethical. Many of his peers, from biology to psychology, agree. And while the rationale for discontinuing such testing has many factors, one reason stands out. The fundamental questions we had about parent-child separation, Gluck says, were answered long ago.

https://www.popsci.com/1950s-experiments-attachment-unethical?src=SOC&dom=tw

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
These 1950s experiments showed us the trauma of parent-child separation. Now experts say they're too (Original Post) demmiblue Aug 2018 OP
I watched a nature show about chimps and will always be heartbroken BigmanPigman Aug 2018 #1
Send this to the Democratic leaders FiveGoodMen Aug 2018 #2
"...too unethical to repeat." dchill Aug 2018 #3

BigmanPigman

(51,588 posts)
1. I watched a nature show about chimps and will always be heartbroken
Sat Aug 11, 2018, 03:45 PM
Aug 2018

over it. In a jungle by a stream a mother chimp died and all of the other chimps in their group came to where her body was and they all stayed and mourned her death for a few days. However, her child, a full grown chimp, was so devastated that he built a hammock in the trees above her dead body and stayed there for three weeks until he finally died too. Their parent-child bonds are very, very strong.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»These 1950s experiments s...