Apple said Qualcomm's tech was no good. But in private communications, it was 'the best.'
During the roughly two years Apple was locked in a legal battle with one of its suppliers, Qualcomm, the iPhone maker publicly argued that the chip makers technology was worthless.
But according to an internal Apple memo Qualcomm showed during the trial this week between the two tech companies, Apples hardware executives used words like the best to describe Qualcomms engineering. Another Apple memo described Qualcomm as having a unique patent share and significant holdings.
The sealed documents, obtained by Qualcomm through the discovery phase ahead of the trial, offer a rare window into the decision-making process of one of the most secretive and powerful companies on the planet, and how Apples internal discussions about Qualcomm differed from what it said publicly. Apples criticism of Qualcomm underpinned more than 80 lawsuits around the world and influenced governments to change laws and regulations in Apples favor. The emails and slide-show presentation, seen by a Washington Post reporter in court, could soon be made available in the docket for all to see, since they were shown at trial. The two sides settled their dispute Tuesday, shortly after the trial began.
The documents also raise questions about the methods Apple used to inflict pain on Qualcomm and whether Apple really believed its own arguments to lawmakers, regulators, judges and juries when it tried to change not just its long-standing business agreement with Qualcomm but the very laws and practices that have allowed inventors to profit from their work and investments. Apple has argued that Qualcomms patents were no more valuable than those of competitors like Ericsson and Huawei, but Qualcomm argued in court that the documents show otherwise.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/04/19/apple-said-qualcomms-tech-was-no-good-private-communications-it-was-best/