Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Distorting 'Democracy' in Venezuela Coverage
MAY 10, 2019
GREGORY SHUPAK
Writing of the failed US-sponsored coup attempt in Venezuela on April 30, Uri Friedman of The Atlantic (5/1/19) referred to the Venezuelan branch of the coup as Juan Guaidós pro-democracy movement. The logical contradiction could scarcely be more pronounced: A wave of Friedmans wand transforms a political force seeking the military overthrow of Venezuelas elected government into a pro-democracy movement.
The Venezuelan governments current mandate comes from winning an election on May 20, 2018 that was observed by more than 150 members of theInternational Electoral Accompaniment Mission. In a joint report, the observers said of the agency that organizes the countrys electoral process, The technical and professional trustworthiness and independence of the National Electoral Council of Venezuela are uncontestable. The Council of Electoral Experts of Latin America, one of the groups that participated in the observer mission, reported that the results communicated by the National Electoral Council reflect the will of the voters who decided to participate in the electoral process.
The Wall Street Journal (5/1/19) performed the same trick, writing that Venezuelas democratic leaders launched a revolt against Cuban-backed dictator Nicolas Maduro. In the Journals universe, Maduro is a dictator despite heading a country with a legislative branch controlled by the opposition, where in October 2017 the opposition won five governorships, and which has thus far declined to arrest a politician agitating for a military putsch in open collaboration with hostile foreign powers, to the extent of entertaining the possibility of supporting a US invasion and supporting US-led sanctions that are devastating the countrys economy.
. . .
For the Journal, Venezuelas democratic leaders are those who sat out the countrys election, claimed it was unfair and then declined to file an appeal with the countrys National Electoral Council (CNE). One is hard-pressed to imagine a more soundly democratic practice than Guaidó not running for president and then declaring himself president even as 80 percent of Venezuelans had never heard of him at the time. According to historian Tony Wood (London Review of Books, 2/21/19):
More:
https://fair.org/home/distorting-democracy-in-venezuela-coverage/?awt_l=5xHp4&awt_m=hxro_mtLAmOI_TQ
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 900 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Distorting 'Democracy' in Venezuela Coverage (Original Post)
Judi Lynn
May 2019
OP
watoos
(7,142 posts)1. We were sold a fairy tale,
We were shown thousands of protesters in the streets and told they were Guaido supporters when in fact they were Maduro supporters.
Uncle Joe
(58,482 posts)2. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread Judi Lynn.