'Inside the Right- Wing YouTube Empire That's Quietly Turning Millennials Into Conservatives'
'Inside the Right-Wing YouTube Empire Thats Quietly Turning Millennials Into Conservatives.' The viral videos from Dennis Pragers university have clocked more than 1 bill views. Mark Oppenheimer, Mother Jones, *Mar-Apr 2018. Ed., Excerpts:
In the weeks after Donald Trump was elected president, Americans flocked to the internet with pressing questions. Some inquired about immigration to Canada. Others Googled sanctuary city. And millions were newly curious about the Electoral College, which for the second time in recent memory was going to contravene the will of the majority. What was it? Why was it? Could electors defy their voters wishes?
People turned to the New York Times and the Washington Post, Fox News, and even the Constitution for answers. But few sources were as widely consulted as Do You Understand the Electoral College? a five-minute video hosted by retired lawyer and television pundit Tara Ross. Her genial lecture, illustrated with colorful cartoons and pop-up textpure democracies do not workcan be found at Prager University, an online video portal curated by the conservative talk-radio host Dennis Prager. The Electoral College video had about 850,000 views before the election, says Allen Estrin, Pragers producer and consigliere. Two weeks later, it had 50 million. (*See video below).
The intellectual quality of Ross video is decidedly junior varsity. She doesnt mention how the Electoral College was born of a compromise with slave states or note the degree to which it skews the will of the majorityfor example, by effectively giving a Wyoming residents vote almost quadruple the power of a Californians. She also claims (bizarrely) that the Electoral College thwarts voter fraud. But never mind any of that. The video is short and memorable, with quick cuts, zippy graphics, and cool sound effects.
Since 2012, PragerU has posted nearly 300 similarly digestible videos. At PragerU, police are not biased against black men, and man-made climate change is debatable. Youll find takes on animal rights (against), the $15 minimum wage (against), the gender wage gap (doesnt exist), and why the South turned Republican (nothing to do with race). PragerU students dont earn degrees, of course. Yet a dedicated viewer might walk away with the consistently conservative outlook of a charming, curmudgeonly 69-year-old radio personality who lacks the ratings of his blustery peersthe Sean Hannitys and Mark Levins and Alex Jonesesbut boasts a more reassuring disposition. Despite his chosen profession and Brooklyn upbringing, Prager is no yeller. He welcomes guests with whom he disagrees and is respectful to all callers. Prager is convinced that at this historical moment our society is collapsing, and a liberal Supreme Court nominee could portend the final flood. Last summer, he tweeted that Western media outlets pose a far greater danger to Western civilization than Russia does.
Prager explained to me that because the universities have all but shut down, not to mention demonized, nonleft ideas, and the media are not far behind, it is his duty to provide a conservative take on things that mattereconomics, good and evil, America, Israel, religion, God, etc. His goal is to imbue young people with the principles on which America was founded, and to demonstrate why Western society will not survive the death of Judeo-Christian values.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Prager
These instinctsPrager the Genial Radio Host and Prager the Gloomy Prophetmerge in PragerU, whose videos are too gentle in tone for the Infowars crowd and too conservative for committed liberals. Rather, they are engineered to sway those in the mushy middle, especially young people trying to figure out what they stand for. Pragers radio show has about 2 million weekly listeners (to Rush Limbaughs 14 million), but PragerUs appeal goes well beyond the graying talk-radio audience. More than 60 percent of its viewers are younger than 35, according to YouTube analytics. Strazzeri estimates that 100 million individualsalmost one-third of the US populationhave watched at least part of a PragerU video via Facebook, where the organization has more than 2.8 million followers.
With his move past talk radio, Prager is making a play for the future, for the generations that arent listening to AM in the car, if they even drive. By meeting young people on their own turfsocial media, smartphonesand addressing them amiably, Prager manages to deliver conservative thought in a package even Never Trumpers are willing to open.
Among the major contributors are Dan and Farris Wilks, fracking billionaires who want to bring Christianity into public schools. (PragerUs Educators Program encourages K-12 teachers and college professors to use our curriculum as a teaching supplement.) The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, another funder of right-leaning educational initiatives, has given a substantial sum, too. The left also has deployed bite-size videos to sway millennials, albeit with less success. Inequality Media, founded in 2014 by former Labor Secretary Robert Reich and filmmaker Jacob Kornbluth, has produced about 120 shorts, most featuring Reich. The most popular, Trump and the Press, has received more than 10 million views. But PragerUs marketing savvy puts it miles ahead of any ideological competitors. Strazzeris team works diligently to sync Pragers offerings to the news cycle via targeted Facebook and YouTube ad buys.
All our videos are evergreens, he explains. Every day we are looking at what is trending, lining up the right videos, and pushing them. "In the world of the internet, five minutes is the right dosage, Estrin says. You can get a lot in politics, history, a lot of things."...
More, https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/03/inside-right-wing-youtube-turning-millennials-conservative-prageru-video-dennis-prager/
"Pure democracies do not work, they implode." Tara Ross, PragerU.
badhair77
(4,218 posts)appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)but the popularity and influence of 'university teaching videos' with younger ages can't be dismissed.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Bookmarking to read & watch later.
TheRealNorth
(9,481 posts)Milennials are not immune to right-wing "brainwashing" any more that boomers or X'rs.
appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)>"100 million individualsalmost one-third of the US populationhave watched at least part of a PragerU video via Facebook, where the organization has more than 2.8 million followers."
walkingman
(7,616 posts)their idealism we are all in deep trouble. Life is hard enough without losing hope and that is exactly the attraction that the right-wing offers. When all else fails there will always be a "magic person" there for you ready to help.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)Do only people who agree with him watch?
appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 27, 2019, 02:54 PM - Edit history (1)
"More than 60 percent of its viewers are younger than 35, according to YouTube analytics. If Pragers goal is, as Sykes suggests, to save America, is he succeeding? The billion views, the 100 million Facebook uniqueswhat do these numbers mean?
Its hard to say. PragerUs most recent polling, of nearly 3,000 Facebook followers, suggests the videos are effective, Strazzeri says: 70 percent of people who have seen a Prager video changed their minds on an issue. Thats a self-selecting sample, though.
In one of the sites What We Do videos, a spokesman who wouldnt look out of place in a boy band claims that we are building a counterculture, with an impact on millions of people every day, but the Twitteresque testimonials he cites have generic handles like @Lucy943 that lead to dormant Twitter accounts.
Another PragerU pitchwoman boasts that Tom, the former head of the Stanford College Democrats, resigned after binge-watching PragerU videos. I couldnt verify Toms existence, nor would PragerU put me in touch.
Canned testimonials aside, I dont doubt PragerUs videos are changing minds. Most of us are fairly ignorant about most things, so what happens when our outlook on a subject is based largely on one slick, accessible video? Knowing little about Native American politics, I found Naomi Schaefer Rileys argumentthat American Indian poverty is largely the fault of well-meaning government overreachpretty persuasive. Im sure theres another side, but what if fact-checking her thesis isnt high on my priority list?"
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)JudyM
(29,248 posts)appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 28, 2019, 12:33 AM - Edit history (1)
rise of Independent leaning voters- both more right leaning. Not the case for liberals & Dems. in the Boomer gen.