Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(15,756 posts)
Mon Aug 3, 2020, 07:26 PM Aug 2020

Democrats are threatening to expand the Supreme Court. Good.

With an election three months away in which Republicans very well may lose the White House and Senate — even as the 87-year-old Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is battling cancer yet again — the question has arisen anew: What if a Supreme Court seat becomes open between now and the election?

Or even more pointedly, what if a vacancy occurs after an election Republicans lose, but before the new Democratic Senate and president take office? Would Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ram through another conservative justice as a last grab at right-wing judicial supremacy?

In May 2019, McConnell was asked what he would do if a seat became open in the last year of President Trump’s term. “We’d fill it,” he said with a smirk, surprising no one. The reason people in the room laughed knowingly was that when Republicans refused to allow President Barack Obama to fill a vacant seat in 2016, they claimed to be following a new principle, that no president should fill a seat in the final year of a term.

In a career of cynical manipulation and disingenuous rhetoric, it was a high point for McConnell; he himself has bragged many times that stymieing Merrick Garland’s nomination “was the most consequential decision I’ve ever made in my entire public career.” That McConnell did it while claiming he was following a “rule” that ought to apply equally to Democratic and Republican presidencies was icing on the cake, not in spite of but because everyone knew he and Republicans who followed his lead were lying through their grinning teeth.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/08/03/democrats-are-threatening-expand-supreme-court-good/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats are threatening to expand the Supreme Court. Good. (Original Post) Zorro Aug 2020 OP
Pack the place.... Historic NY Aug 2020 #1
shhhhhh dont tell trump* cuz then he will do it... samnsara Aug 2020 #2
Don't threaten, just do it Fiendish Thingy Aug 2020 #3
I have a proposal hvn_nbr_2 Aug 2020 #4
We do need to dilute Trump's maleficent appointees, each needs a supervisor... lagomorph777 Aug 2020 #5

Historic NY

(37,461 posts)
1. Pack the place....
Mon Aug 3, 2020, 07:32 PM
Aug 2020

its time to start acting like people that what to change this system of government so rigged.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,707 posts)
3. Don't threaten, just do it
Mon Aug 3, 2020, 08:23 PM
Aug 2020

Expand SCOTUS to least 12, preferably 15 seats. Do it in Biden’s first 100 days.

I want Hannity, Carlson and Alex Jones so enraged that they threaten the life of the president and get hauled in by the Secret Service.

hvn_nbr_2

(6,492 posts)
4. I have a proposal
Tue Aug 4, 2020, 11:06 AM
Aug 2020

For every federal judge appointed by Trump, we should add one seat to that specific court. Then whenever any Trump appointee is gone for any reason--death, retirement, resignation, imprisonment--then that judge's seat is eliminated. So there would be a temporary but fairly long-term balancing, followed by a gradual return to current levels.

I call it the Trump Brazen Incompetence Nullification Act "T-BINA."

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
5. We do need to dilute Trump's maleficent appointees, each needs a supervisor...
Tue Aug 4, 2020, 04:47 PM
Aug 2020

until we can impeach as many as possible.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Democrats are threatening...