Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ItsjustMe

(11,251 posts)
Tue Oct 20, 2020, 03:30 PM Oct 2020

Texas doesn't have to tell voters if their mail-in ballots were rejected until after election

https://www.salon.com/2020/10/20/texas-doesnt-have-to-tell-voters-if-their-mail-in-ballots-were-rejected-until-after-election-court/

Afederal appellate court panel on Monday ruled that Texas neither has to give voters a chance to correct issues with their ballots nor inform them if a ballot was rejected until after the election.

The ruling allows election officials to reject ballots over mismatched signatures without allowing voters to correct the problem — or even notifying them of a pending rejection.

U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia ruled last month that the state's process for verifying signatures on mail-in ballots "plainly violates certain voters' constitutional rights" and was "inherently fraught with error with no recourse for voters." Garcia ordered the state to change its process, because the current one "fails to guarantee basic fairness."

A three-judge panel on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the order last month. It allowed the state on Monday to keep its current rules in place until it reviews the case after the election, according to The Texas Tribune.

Under the current rules, the state does not have any process to allow voters to correct their ballots and does not have to inform voters if a ballot was rejected until 10 days after the election.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas doesn't have to tell voters if their mail-in ballots were rejected until after election (Original Post) ItsjustMe Oct 2020 OP
considering only over 65 voters can generally vote mail in ballot qazplm135 Oct 2020 #1
Now THAT is funny soothsayer Oct 2020 #3
You would think that would be the case .. but you would be wrong, jb5150 Oct 2020 #4
I'm talking about this particular situation qazplm135 Oct 2020 #5
is this system new? stopdiggin Oct 2020 #2

qazplm135

(7,447 posts)
1. considering only over 65 voters can generally vote mail in ballot
Tue Oct 20, 2020, 03:37 PM
Oct 2020

(with some exceptions) almost as likely to be Trump votes rejected.

jb5150

(1,183 posts)
4. You would think that would be the case .. but you would be wrong,
Tue Oct 20, 2020, 05:32 PM
Oct 2020

Every study done shows that minority mail in ballots are rejected at a much higher rate.

qazplm135

(7,447 posts)
5. I'm talking about this particular situation
Tue Oct 20, 2020, 06:06 PM
Oct 2020

where you are limited to over 65. A significant portion of that vote will be White Trump voters, so a significant number of rejections will risk rejecting a White Trump voter.

The point being is it's not risk free to just indiscriminately reject mail in ballots in Texas for Trump.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Texas doesn't have to tel...