Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Texas doesn't have to tell voters if their mail-in ballots were rejected until after election
https://www.salon.com/2020/10/20/texas-doesnt-have-to-tell-voters-if-their-mail-in-ballots-were-rejected-until-after-election-court/Afederal appellate court panel on Monday ruled that Texas neither has to give voters a chance to correct issues with their ballots nor inform them if a ballot was rejected until after the election.
The ruling allows election officials to reject ballots over mismatched signatures without allowing voters to correct the problem or even notifying them of a pending rejection.
U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia ruled last month that the state's process for verifying signatures on mail-in ballots "plainly violates certain voters' constitutional rights" and was "inherently fraught with error with no recourse for voters." Garcia ordered the state to change its process, because the current one "fails to guarantee basic fairness."
A three-judge panel on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the order last month. It allowed the state on Monday to keep its current rules in place until it reviews the case after the election, according to The Texas Tribune.
Under the current rules, the state does not have any process to allow voters to correct their ballots and does not have to inform voters if a ballot was rejected until 10 days after the election.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 927 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas doesn't have to tell voters if their mail-in ballots were rejected until after election (Original Post)
ItsjustMe
Oct 2020
OP
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)1. considering only over 65 voters can generally vote mail in ballot
(with some exceptions) almost as likely to be Trump votes rejected.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)3. Now THAT is funny
jb5150
(1,183 posts)4. You would think that would be the case .. but you would be wrong,
Every study done shows that minority mail in ballots are rejected at a much higher rate.
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)5. I'm talking about this particular situation
where you are limited to over 65. A significant portion of that vote will be White Trump voters, so a significant number of rejections will risk rejecting a White Trump voter.
The point being is it's not risk free to just indiscriminately reject mail in ballots in Texas for Trump.
stopdiggin
(11,370 posts)2. is this system new?
Or is this the same process that has been in place for previous elections?