GOP senator on DC statehood: 'No one is compelled to actually' live there
Celine Castronuovo 13 hrs ago
GOP Sen. James Lankford (Okla.) on Tuesday vocalized opposition to making Washington, D.C., the 51st state in the union, arguing that the nation's capital has not had voting representatives in Congress for some time and that "no one's compelled to actually" live there.
"Any individual that moves to Washington, D.C., understands that Washington, D.C. is unique," Lankford said during the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing Tuesday over legislation that seeks to legalize D.C. statehood.
Lankford argued that D.C. residents should know upon moving to the District that "this is a place where you don't have a vote for a senator or a House member," though he acknowledged that D.C. for decades has had a non-voting delegate in the House, a position currently held by Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D).
"It's been well known that when you move to Washington, D.C., at any point, you're moving to an area that doesn't have two senators or a House member," the Oklahoma senator continued.
More:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gop-senator-on-dc-statehood-no-one-is-compelled-to-actually-live-there/ar-AALk4xo?li=BBnb7Kz
Sen. James Lankford
elleng
(130,895 posts)5X
(3,972 posts)padah513
(2,502 posts)These are some horrible people. The state of Oklahoma has 3.97 million people. Washington DC has 5.37 million. Why should his state with fewer people have more representation than the District of Columbia?
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)... after the original 13!
Edit:
If he wants, we could return to only US reps from the original 13 states. I'd be happy with a 21-5 Democratic advantage in the Senate!
lees1975
(3,850 posts)to live in Oklahoma which remained a territory for as long as it had a native American population. It did not become a state until it had a majority white population.