Ukraine Crisis: Putin Should Remember That Biden Is a Cold Warrior
The Russian president is forcing the United States to show tenacity in a crisis, a dynamic closely watched by China as the confrontation may exact a high economic price from Moscow
Vladimir Putin is upping the ante on Ukraine. He believes hes exercising what is called escalation dominance the ability to escalate a crisis in all dimensions: keeping your intentions cloaked while controlling the timetable, deployment of forces and intensity.
What Putin may be miscalculating is how the Ukraine crisis may unravel, Americas determination and the possible consequences.
Its true that in one crisis, Putin has rekindled an era of superpower conflict, and in this respect he has repositioned himself and Russia in the center of geopolitical attention. Less clear is what Russia gains from this.
Putin, who was spoiled by the easy comfort zone of dealing with an admiring and clueless President Donald Trump, may be forgetting one thing: Joe Bidens formative years were the Cold War. Trump may have liked Putin, but Biden distrusts Russia profoundly.
Full Article: https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/ukraine-crisis-putin-should-remember-that-biden-is-a-cold-warrior-1.10544890
I believe this article is spot on. Putin is underestimating the resolve of President Biden and the entire free world. The Russians have also downplayed the threat of sanctions, but the proposed sanctions I have read about will be absolutely devastating to Russia, as the article points out. I believe Russia will be isolated internationally while a devastating economic depression will ravage the country in every corner.
Russia's leaders are also underestimating Ukrainian resolve to defend their homeland. If the Russian military invades Ukraine again, they will be met with the ferocity the likes not even seen in rabid mad dogs. The Russian military will become bogged down in conflict and thousands of body bags will be sent home to Moscow and weeping mothers.
I will never understand what this man (Putin) thinks he will accomplish with such a foolish move. So I will stop trying to understand because it will drive me crazy if I don't.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Pos bully!
Thunderbeast
(3,419 posts)Europe may need to adjust their economies faster than planned. Russia's growing leverage over western Europe's energy markets will complicate any non-kinetic responses to aggression.
blue-wave
(4,363 posts)Walleye
(31,045 posts)captain queeg
(10,242 posts)Ukraine is a large country with a long border with Russia. And a long tradition of partisan warfare. They might not be able to stop an invasion directly, but there will be no surrender, and itll drag on and spill over into Russian soil. I dont think the benefits to Russia will outweigh the consequences and I dont think itll go over well with the russian population. It just doesnt seem like a good idea, but maybe Im missing something.
blue-wave
(4,363 posts)I've been thinking the same thing. The Ukrainians most likely have targets inside Russia they will hit.
The Unmitigated Gall
(3,830 posts)And only two of them, Obama and Biden seem to have recognized Putin as the threat to world security and order he actually is.
wnylib
(21,606 posts)Hillary's candidacy brought Putin and Republicans together to support Trump against her because Rs and Putin feared her.
When Russia was communist, Rs hated them. But now that they are ruled by an anti democracy oligarchy, Republicans love Russia. Trump is not the only one who idolizes today's Russian system. Russia has the kind of government that Republicans drool over.
blue-wave
(4,363 posts)The Unmitigated Gall
(3,830 posts)blue-wave
(4,363 posts)karynnj
(59,504 posts)marie999
(3,334 posts)If Ukraine joins NATO, NATO will have an almost 2,700-mile border with Belarus and Russia. Suppose all of Latin America, except for Mexico, with the number 2 military including nuclear weapons was an enemy of the U.S. and Mexico wanted to join the other Latin American countries. What would the U.S. do? What did the U.S. do when there were Russian missiles in Cuba, and Russian officers and Cuban workers were extending the runways in Grenada so that Russian TU-95 bombers with nuclear capabilities could be placed there? There are already 5 NATO countries that have U.S. nuclear weapons.
YP_Yooper
(291 posts)No.
I've spent time in the Ukraine, and anti-war, and if you even suggest there is another view here, you're pro-putin. Sad, really, because it would make the neocons so friggin proud, and McCain smiling from the grave :/
marie999
(3,334 posts)Of course, I look at the other side, that is what I was trained to do. Of course our government especially our military has to look at the other side. How are they supposed to know what to do if they don't? I think the best answer right now is for Ukraine to remain neutral. A treaty that Ukraine will not join NATO with Russia agreeing to leave Ukraine alone and pull back its troops. Unless both sides agree to it, there will be a war. Pravda has been covering the Ukraine issue. Some of their articles are facts, but I have been reading more propaganda to get the Russian people ready for war. Izvestia is reprinting articles such as the one on the hundredth anniversary of the invasion of Russia by the U.S. Pravda reprinting article about Churchill and "Operation Unthinkable" a military plan to invade Russia at the end of WWII. Russia is getting ready for a war. It is planning to deploy troops and anti-aircraft missile battalions to Belarus in February.
YP_Yooper
(291 posts)?
I'm confused and apologize. I'm using "you" in a general plural sense, not you specifically because I've been accused of being pro-Putin simply for looking at the issue from other perspectives. My point is that I've seen on DU frequently that unless one agrees that anything against Russia is good - up to and including war - you're good. Otherwise, you're "Boris".
I agree with your assessment, if anything, because NATO at least tacitly agreed not to expand that far. Ukraine has far more to gain in being close to Russia not just being the "bread basket" of the region, but the energy economy - rather than joining NATO and the military presence expected right on the Russian border.
marie999
(3,334 posts)marie999
(3,334 posts)YP_Yooper
(291 posts)and having another person to offer me a new rabbit hole I can spend time on reading about in understanding the world
marie999
(3,334 posts)Search "THe war was not meant to be won." read it down to "but to keep the very structure of society intact". If you haven't read the book or seen the movie watch the movie made in 1985 starring John Hurt and Richard Burton. John Hurt's part seems very similar to Fox News.
YP_Yooper
(291 posts)It's been a long while, but I think I'll watch it this evening. Again, TY