Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(15,749 posts)
Thu Feb 10, 2022, 12:48 PM Feb 2022

A Trump adviser's angry eruption over Jan. 6 bodes badly for democracy

It is a central tenet of Donald Trump’s evolving mythology about Jan. 6 that what transpired that day constituted a world-historical act of betrayal — of Donald Trump.

In this stab-in-the-back lore, when Mike Pence refused to invalidate Joe Biden’s electors and help Trump overturn the election, Trump’s vice president treacherously failed to do not just what he could have done, but what he should have done, on Trump’s behalf.

One of Trump’s leading Jan. 6 co-conspirators — former adviser Peter Navarro — just doubled down on this notion. He’s not alone: The persistence of this among some top Trumpists — and the refusal of others to unequivocally side with Pence — bodes badly, as Trump’s movement adopts the idea that the only thing wrong with his coup scheme was that it failed.

Navarro’s restatement of the Pence-as-betrayer myth comes in response to a subpoena he received from the House select committee examining Jan. 6. The committee is examining Navarro’s role as a key orchestrator of the effort to get Biden’s electors invalidated in Congress.

Here’s how Navarro responded, in an angry email to the New York Times:

“Pence betrayed Trump. Marc Short is a Koch Network dog. Meadows is a fool and a coward. Cheney and Kinzinger are useful idiots for Nancy Pelosi and the woke Left,” Mr. Navarro wrote in an email.

To Navarro, Pence wasn’t the only traitor: Top White House advisers Mark Meadows and Marc Short have cooperated in a limited way with the Jan. 6 committee. The perfidy of Reps. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), both committee members, goes without saying.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/02/10/peter-navarro-subpoena-trump-accountability/

Gee, I wonder how this dipshit -- who went on national tv and admitted to planning a coup -- will respond to his subpoena...
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Martin68

(22,853 posts)
2. Nah, there are far worse threats to Democracy walking about right now. Navarro isn't one of them,
Thu Feb 10, 2022, 03:13 PM
Feb 2022

The more dangerous ones are gerrymandering Republican districts, changing state election laws, and blocking voting rights legislation in Congress.

Ford_Prefect

(7,917 posts)
4. Navarro is caught in the wringer and can't back up. Instead he's alleging that
Thu Feb 10, 2022, 03:38 PM
Feb 2022

Trump and his minions possess the power to once more shut Congress and government down.

Trump is one piece of paper away from warrant, arrest and arraignment. His Minions are being steered towards disaster for the GOP and for America. When Trump is sitting in a holding cell, demanding his bail, the GOP members are gonna be running for the hills, not to a bondsman.

The sad fools who drank the Qoolaid are another matter. They have less value in the larger scheme than the MSM has larded upon them. Once that message hits the MSM I suspect we may see a different song sung on prime time news.

riversedge

(70,283 posts)
10. I have little hope that "Once that message hits the MSM I suspect we may see a different song sung
Fri Feb 11, 2022, 01:42 AM
Feb 2022


on prime time news". Maybe a few will. We can hope.

KS Toronado

(17,306 posts)
5. Thought I read somewhere he was going to claim executive privilege.
Thu Feb 10, 2022, 03:46 PM
Feb 2022

After all he done nothing wrong, it was just legitimate political discourse.

do I really need this

6. Navarro is a dumbass. The idea that Pence could declare Trump and himself the winners is farcical
Thu Feb 10, 2022, 03:56 PM
Feb 2022

If a VP actually had that power, there would never be another Republican President. Jan 6th 2025, Harris would declare she and Biden won reelection. In 2029, as sitting VP on Jan 6th, she would declare herself President Elect and be sworn in as President on the 20th. Her VP would declare themselves winners in 2033. Wash, rinse, repeat for every future election.

aggiesal

(8,922 posts)
7. I wonder how this dipshit -- who went on national tv and admitted to planning a coup ...
Thu Feb 10, 2022, 04:02 PM
Feb 2022
-- will respond ...

I believe clogging the toilet comes to mind.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»A Trump adviser's angry e...