Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MissMillie

(38,560 posts)
Thu Apr 21, 2022, 02:57 PM Apr 2022

Sorry, New York Times: Republicans aren't "concerned" about democracy -- they want to destroy it

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/sorry-new-york-times-republicans-arent-concerned-about-democracy-%e2%80%94-they-want-to-destroy-it/ar-AAWsbR4?ocid=U483DHP&li=BBnb7Kz


Admitting that a plurality of Americans are straight up fascist is the third rail in mainstream political media.

In a pathetic bid to make the story seem fair-and-balanced — rather than plain old truthful — Epstein and Weisman lean heavily on euphemisms to describe Republican enthusiasm for repeating the Big Lie. In the subhead, Republican voters are described as "energized about the issues of elections and voting." To describe the three-quarters support among GOP voters for anti-democratic conspiracy theories, the writers go with "impassioned about electoral issues."

While the reporters are careful to repeatedly note that there is no basis for claims that Biden stole the election, this kind of framing of the Big Lie as a sincere-if-misguided concern is still a massive problem. It makes it sound as if Republican voters have legitimate concerns about the future of democracy. In reality, however, Republican voters are increasingly hostile to democracy.



****************************

spot on
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sorry, New York Times: Republicans aren't "concerned" about democracy -- they want to destroy it (Original Post) MissMillie Apr 2022 OP
It isn't just that there is no basis, it is a LIE, and the media needs to call it out as such JohnSJ Apr 2022 #1
+1 2naSalit Apr 2022 #2
"energized about the issues of elections and voting." Ray Bruns Apr 2022 #3
What are we going to do about these clowns? wryter2000 Apr 2022 #4

Ray Bruns

(4,098 posts)
3. "energized about the issues of elections and voting."
Thu Apr 21, 2022, 03:42 PM
Apr 2022

Bald faced lie. It I actually subscribed to the New York Times, I'd be pissed.

wryter2000

(46,051 posts)
4. What are we going to do about these clowns?
Thu Apr 21, 2022, 03:44 PM
Apr 2022

I'd like to be on a crusade to get rid of the term "spending bill." MSNBC folks use it, too. What in hell is a spending bill? There are defense bills and infrastructure bills. Is a spending bill an excuse to spend money with no particular goal or accomplishment in mind? Do the folks in charge think "Look at all this money. We need to find a way to spend it."?

I'd like to ask all of them, "Please define 'spending bill.'"

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Sorry, New York Times: Re...