Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Sorry, New York Times: Republicans aren't "concerned" about democracy -- they want to destroy it
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/sorry-new-york-times-republicans-arent-concerned-about-democracy-%e2%80%94-they-want-to-destroy-it/ar-AAWsbR4?ocid=U483DHP&li=BBnb7KzAdmitting that a plurality of Americans are straight up fascist is the third rail in mainstream political media.
In a pathetic bid to make the story seem fair-and-balanced rather than plain old truthful Epstein and Weisman lean heavily on euphemisms to describe Republican enthusiasm for repeating the Big Lie. In the subhead, Republican voters are described as "energized about the issues of elections and voting." To describe the three-quarters support among GOP voters for anti-democratic conspiracy theories, the writers go with "impassioned about electoral issues."
While the reporters are careful to repeatedly note that there is no basis for claims that Biden stole the election, this kind of framing of the Big Lie as a sincere-if-misguided concern is still a massive problem. It makes it sound as if Republican voters have legitimate concerns about the future of democracy. In reality, however, Republican voters are increasingly hostile to democracy.
In a pathetic bid to make the story seem fair-and-balanced rather than plain old truthful Epstein and Weisman lean heavily on euphemisms to describe Republican enthusiasm for repeating the Big Lie. In the subhead, Republican voters are described as "energized about the issues of elections and voting." To describe the three-quarters support among GOP voters for anti-democratic conspiracy theories, the writers go with "impassioned about electoral issues."
While the reporters are careful to repeatedly note that there is no basis for claims that Biden stole the election, this kind of framing of the Big Lie as a sincere-if-misguided concern is still a massive problem. It makes it sound as if Republican voters have legitimate concerns about the future of democracy. In reality, however, Republican voters are increasingly hostile to democracy.
****************************
spot on
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1562 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sorry, New York Times: Republicans aren't "concerned" about democracy -- they want to destroy it (Original Post)
MissMillie
Apr 2022
OP
JohnSJ
(92,217 posts)1. It isn't just that there is no basis, it is a LIE, and the media needs to call it out as such
Ray Bruns
(4,098 posts)3. "energized about the issues of elections and voting."
Bald faced lie. It I actually subscribed to the New York Times, I'd be pissed.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)4. What are we going to do about these clowns?
I'd like to be on a crusade to get rid of the term "spending bill." MSNBC folks use it, too. What in hell is a spending bill? There are defense bills and infrastructure bills. Is a spending bill an excuse to spend money with no particular goal or accomplishment in mind? Do the folks in charge think "Look at all this money. We need to find a way to spend it."?
I'd like to ask all of them, "Please define 'spending bill.'"