Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grntuscarora

(1,249 posts)
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 11:37 AM Jul 2012

Shell Clarifies: It Can ‘Encounter’ 95 Percent Of An Arctic Oil Spill, Not Collect It

by Joe Smyth

As Shell’s rigs head toward the Arctic to exploit melting sea ice to drill for more oil, the company took a small step this weekend in clarifying what would happen in an oil spill during the company’s planned Arctic drilling operations this summer.

Despite the oil industry’s spin, experts know it is impossible to recover more than a small fraction of a major marine oil spill, as retired Coast Guard Admiral Roger Rufe told NPR: “But once oil is in the water, it’s a mess. And we’ve never proven anywhere in the world — let alone in the ice — that we’re very good at picking up more than 3 or 5 or 10 percent of the oil once it’s in the water.”

So how is it possible, according to the New York Times, that Interior Secretary Ken Salazar “said he believed the company’s claims that it could collect at least 90 percent of any oil spilled in the event of a well blowout.” These sorts of claims have raised eyebrows among advocates and scientists who study offshore oil drilling — they aren’t just unbelievable, they’re laughably, outrageously impossible.

full piece at http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/07/02/509453/shell-clarifies-it-can-encounter-95-percent-of-an-arctic-oil-spill-not-collect-it/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shell Clarifies: It Can ‘Encounter’ 95 Percent Of An Arctic Oil Spill, Not Collect It (Original Post) grntuscarora Jul 2012 OP
What the hell does 'encounter' mean? louis-t Jul 2012 #1
No, no. grntuscarora Jul 2012 #2
Probably means they're able to spray it from the air with that poison Corexit. valerief Jul 2012 #3
Like it on FaceBook n/t IDemo Jul 2012 #7
This whole thing makes me Auntie Bush Jul 2012 #4
Did anyone else see the irony in this statement? KansDem Jul 2012 #5
Yes, but someone will get RICH doing it so it's ok. louis-t Jul 2012 #6
. XemaSab Jul 2012 #8

Auntie Bush

(17,528 posts)
4. This whole thing makes me
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:27 PM
Jul 2012
cry: y:

I can't believe a Democrat administration is allowing such a disaster to happen.

cry: y:


What will happen to the polar Bears and other Arctic wildlife?



When are we going to learn?

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
5. Did anyone else see the irony in this statement?
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 01:56 PM
Jul 2012
As Shell’s rigs head toward the Arctic to exploit melting sea ice to drill for more oil...

So Shell is going to take advantage of melting sea ice caused by global warming so it can drill for more oil that will contribute to more global warming which causes more sea ice to melt so Shell can take advantage...(and so on)

It's a vicious circle!
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Shell Clarifies: It Can ‘...