Wendell Potter: Health Care’s Community-Based Beginnings
http://wendellpotter.com/2012/07/health-cares-community-based-beginnings/
Back during the debate on the Clinton health care reform proposal, insurance executives tried to convince lawmakers that they were on the same side of health care reform as consumers were, so they embraced the idea of community rating in which insurers charge everyone in a given community the same premium regardless of age, gender or health status. In testimony before a House committee in 1993, the president of Cignas health care business assured lawmakers that all the big insurers were on board with a return to community rating.
Fast forward nearly two decades and youll find that insurance executives have changed their tune, now that theyre actually being required to go back to the good old days when community rating was the norm. Todays health insurers want nothing to do with it. Theres just not enough profit in it.
Community rating was the original way insurance companies set prices for their policies. The practice began in the late 1920s when the administrator of Baylor University Hospital in Dallas came up with a strategy to deal with his hospitals mounting expenses. His idea was to have groups of local residents, beginning with the citys teachers, pay fifty cents a month and receive up to 21 days of hospital care if needed during any year. If you were a 21-year-old man who was as healthy as a bear, you paid the same each month as a 42-year-old woman who was not nearly as healthy. It made everybody happy, subscribers and cash-strapped hospital officials alike. Pretty soon, other hospitals began offering similar plans. Eventually they were united under a common name Blue Cross and they were all operated on a nonprofit basis.
After a few years, though, life insurance corporations figured out that they could make a sizable profit if they sold coverage to young, healthy people at cheaper rates. That was the beginning of underwriting in health insurance, and it completely changed everything and, for most of us, not for the better.