The Puppetry of Quotation Approval
Now that its become clear that many journalists covering politics and government agree to quotation-approval as a condition of access, its tough not to see the pageant of democracy as just that: a carefully constructed performance meant to showcase the participants in the best light.
In July, my colleague Jeremy Peters pulled back the blanket on the growing practice of allowing political sources to read and approve quotations as a precondition for an interview. His story got attention inside and outside the Beltway, in part because the quotation is the last refuge of spontaneity in an age of endlessly managed messages. When quotations can be unilaterally taken back, the Kabuki is all but complete.
Those rules of engagement drew new scrutiny last week when Michael Lewis, the author of a forthcoming profile of President Obama in Vanity Fair, acknowledged that he had to get approval for the quotations he used from eight months of extensive access.
Good thing those of us who cover business dont have to deal with the same self-preserving press policies. Except we do. In an anecdotal survey of 20 reporters, it was clear that on Wall Street, in Silicon Valley and at some of the big media companies I cover, subjects of coverage are asking for, and sometimes receiving, the kind of consideration that would have been unthinkable 20 years ago.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/business/media/the-puppetry-of-quotation-approval.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20120917