Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,020 posts)
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 03:00 AM Jun 2013

Devoted to Politics, MSNBC Slips on Breaking News

At MSNBC they view it as rooting against death and destruction: the last thing the channel wants is more months like the last two, filled with terror bombings, tornadoes and plant accidents.

It’s not all altruism. The destruction MSNBC also wants to avoid is the havoc such news has been wreaking on its competitive standing.

In May, MSNBC, which generally runs second to the dominant leader, Fox News, among cable news channels, plunged all the way to fourth place, dropping behind not only its closest rival, CNN, but also that network’s sister channel, HLN (formerly Headline News).

At a time of intensely high interest in news, MSNBC’s ratings declined from the same period a year ago by about 20 percent. The explanation, in the network’s own analysis, comes down to this: breaking news is not really what MSNBC does.

...

MSNBC began to commit itself to presenting a liberal spin on political coverage in the middle of the last decade, partly because it had not found success in previous models (like trying to be a news channel for younger viewers) and mostly because it had one host, Keith Olbermann, whose ratings were exploding based on his outspoken criticisms of the Bush administration and the conservative voices on Fox News.

MSNBC has ridden this formula to a consistent edge over CNN. It has topped that network about 80 percent of the time over the last three years, Mr. Griffin noted, by relying on a lineup of prime-time shows with strong hosts like Rachel Maddow. CNN has never made ideologically impassioned shows the basis of its appeal. Instead, it has thrived when its potent brand identity, the channel for breaking news, has come into play.

Mr. Griffin acknowledged that CNN, which has experienced ratings gains near 100 percent in the last two months, shines in periods of intense news interest. But, he said, this will pass.

...

For the second quarter so far, MSNBC has averaged 704,000 viewers in prime time, down 18 percent from last year. Among viewers that news advertisers pay to reach, those 25 to 54, MSNBC has averaged 214,000 for the quarter, down 11 percent.

The network has experienced steady growth in ratings over the last several years, however, and profits have followed. For example, a Pew Research study put the network’s annual profit at $186.6 million for 2011, up from $168.8 million the prior year. The research firm SNL Kagan estimated MSNBC’s 2012 profit at $202 million.

full: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/business/media/devoted-to-politics-msnbc-slips-on-breaking-news.html?pagewanted=all

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JI7

(89,248 posts)
1. but they didn't report false news during bomb covering like CNN and Fox and others
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 03:11 AM
Jun 2013

and that guy they had on was saying all along that all the talk about the suspect being the missing student was not true.

i hope they don't risk crediblity over short term ratings wars.

House of Roberts

(5,168 posts)
2. Down 18 percent sounds about right
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 04:02 AM
Jun 2013

in the year after a Presidential election.
Absent disaster coverage, there's not much to compel the average TV viewer to turn to a news channel. CNN needs the sensational to attract ratings.
I'm less likely to watch MSNBC when I know there's a marathon of 'breaking news' coverage that's twelve hours old. I'll switch to Thom Hartmann or The Young Turks just to get away from it.
Tornado damage coverage is all the same. You feel bad for the people affected, but destroyed buildings all look the same, and the footage of a funnel is never clear if it's live or recorded, unless they tell you.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
4. the othe cable 'news' outlets saw the opposite, a rise in ratings, for CNN a huge rise
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 10:13 AM
Jun 2013

So it is not a news wide drop. Also cable is not the only news, Network broadcast news still gets the vast majority of viewers, millions and millions at each network, for each news show, say 7-12 million. MSNBC? OP says shy of 800K.
Spending all your money on talking heads only famous because you made them famous is bad for the talking head talent, bad for the network and bad for the audience. News without reporters.

jehop61

(1,735 posts)
3. However, it looks like they've drank the koolaid now
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 08:34 AM
Jun 2013

Just saw an ad on MSNBC that they are providing gavel to gavel coverage on the George Zimmerman trial next week. Shades of Headline News!!!!

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
5. Yeah, Leslie Blitzer asking atheists to praise the lord.
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 12:36 PM
Jun 2013

Comedy gold.

I see why people watch CNN during tragedies.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Devoted to Politics, MSNB...