Karl Grossman: The Giant Lie About Fukushima
March 03, 2014
Nuclear Denial
The Giant Lie About Fukushima
by KARL GROSSMAN
With the third anniversary of the start of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe coming next week, the attempted Giant Lie about the disaster continuesa suppression of information, an effort at dishonesty of historical dimensions.
It involves international entities, especially the International Atomic Energy Agency, national governmental bodiesled in Japan by its current prime minister, the powerful nuclear industry and a nuclear establishment of scientists and others with a vested interest in atomic energy.
<snip>
Meanwhile, the posture of the nuclear promoters is denialinsisting the impacts of the Fukushima catastrophe are essentially non-existent. A massive nuclear accident has occurred and they would make believe it hasnt.
Fukushima is an eerie replay of the denial and controversy that began with the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, wrote Yale University Professor Emeritus Charles Perrow in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists last year. This is the same nuclear denial that also greeted nuclear bomb tests, plutonium plant disasters at Windscale in northern England and Chelyabinsk in the Ural Mountains, and the nuclear power plant accidents at Three Mile Island in the United States and Chernobyl in what is now Ukraine.
<snip>
Demeter
(85,373 posts)but it's continuous, continuing, broadening and spreading. Rather like the contamination, itself.
djean111
(14,255 posts)"Trust us, they are safe!!!!!". But - don't make us liable if/when they fail, please. Thanks.
No, they are expensive and even one or two failures pollutes and kills for a very long time.
All in the name of profit, no matter how much rhetoric is spewed.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)a link.
with plenty of government loan guarantees. Privatize the profits, socialize the costs.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)right near the epicenter of the major earthquake in VA a few years ago, built right on top of a "inactive" fault line.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)DemoTex
(25,397 posts)Dream on.
arikara
(5,562 posts)just not mainstream. Paradoxically, mainstream is the only media that is accepted as truth, even here.
That's something that could change if we put our minds to it.
JEB
(4,748 posts)Thanks for posting.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)I know Science...and these plants are perfectly safe
because they have redundant Back Up Systems!
Did I mention that I know Science??... and you are just a dumb ass?"
"Relax... Its just a teeny-tiney little bit of radiation.
This is no more radiation than you get from a dental X-Ray."
(But what if I already had 2 dental X-Rays this year?)
(Also conveniently forgetting to mention that increases to environmental radiation is CUMULATIVE,
ANY additional radiation is ADDED to what we are already exposed to.
Also noticed that these are generally the SAME people telling us the Genetically Modified food is SAFE too, [font color=gray]... (just like those Nuclear Power Plants).[/font]
Though unlike modern Nuke Plants, there are no Back Up Systems for GM crops.
There is NO Plan B for containment.