AT&T Will Put Cash in your Pocket if you Help Kill Net Neutrality
From Ring of Fire:
Since the Supreme Court decision earlier this year regarding the FCCs ability to regulate Verizon, debates over net neutrality have been ramping up. The latest blow to be delivered in the battle has come from AT&T and is a response to Netflixs request for strong net neutrality rules.
What is Net Neutrality? In the simplest of terms, the concept of Net Neutrality is an agreement by ISPs and other internet intermediaries to treat all data equally. This is to say that the data of a funny cat picture will be given the same priority as the latest episode of Orange is the New Black as an email from your daughter.
AT&T announced in a filing with the FCC that if customers will let it charge companies like Netflix a premium for faster delivery of its content, it will lower the price its customers are paying on their bills.
You can read the full article here at Ring of Fire.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Under a pure 'net neutrality' model there is nothing that says an ISP must give Netflix the bandwidth it
needs.
cprise
(8,445 posts)The major ISPs already have data caps in place. All they have to do is use a rolling 2- or 4-week tally for the amount of data received by a customer, and slow down (all) traffic to that individual account which exceeds the cap they paid for. They could also keep delivery at the same speed, but add surcharges for each gigabyte extra that is downloaded.
AT&T's way of doing it requires in effect sponsorship from large corporations in order for certain content to get through to any customer quickly and reliably. The alternative is to have AT&T compete with other Internet providers based on the total amount of data they can deliver per dollar to customers, something they are loathe to do because a commodity pusher has no control over content.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)rec
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)recently and they were blaming their poor service all on Netflix, they had no concept of what Net Neutrality is about ...
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)really understand what's really going on. In that way it's pretty much like every other important issue in the US.
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)networks (Fox, ABC, CBS). That sounds bizarre but I think would be legal. Hilarity will ensue.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)JoeyT
(6,785 posts)I'd love to believe people aren't stupid enough to buy it, but plenty will.