Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumIf Bob Zubrin says we should go to Mars; we should go to Mars
I wonder when this will ever be funded by an American administration?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)No sooner.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)I also think both are things that we could do if we would only make that choice. I want our species to flourish throughout the solar system. And beyond.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)project_bluebook
(411 posts)We cannot spend like rich playboys when we have a 15% poverty rate.
imthevicar
(811 posts)We know all our eggs are in one basket. we will be fools to leave them their.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)We have no future out in space or on another planet. It would cost way too much and there would be little in return.
We should spend the money in developing our science programs rather than on a relatively useless expensive program to put a few men in space. The Apollo moon program cost over 300 billion dollars in today's money, and we quit going since there was little point in returning to the moon.
DaDeacon
(984 posts)The new world was not settled when poverty left the old world. The Applying a "Utopia first clause" to exploration is wishful but not practical.
semanticwikiian
(69 posts)Gosh technology lets us do so many things
... like atomic weapons
don't we/you realize that there's a moral/ethical content in everything?
Going to Mars (and I will view this later when I have time)
... and then the planets beyond !!! Whoopee !!!!
is the most nauseating idea imaginable.
How about doing something constructive like
... you know, maybe fixing climate change?
... you know, for the other 99.9999999999999999999% of us?
Nauseating, self-serving egotistic snake oil salesmen.
But I'll watch this with an open mind, later !
D Gary Grady
(133 posts)I very much agree there should be no hungry or homeless kids, or adults either, come to that. But I'd hate to see us just abandon everything else -- science, the arts, the humanities, public broadcasting, parks, libraries, infrastructure -- in the meantime. We can and should do more than one thing. It might help to recall that in constant, inflation-adjusted dollars, the grand total of all NASA from its creation in the 1950s through today (including the Apollo program, the space shuttle, the International Space Station, Skylab, Pioneer, Voyager, New Horizons, Mars rovers, and scads and scads of other things) is less than current U.S. defense spending for a single year.
It's quite reasonable to disagree about priorities, spending levels, human astronauts versus robot probes, and so on, but it might be best to discuss it without staking out extreme initial positions or denouncing any deviation from one's own views as nauseatingly immoral.
I also agree that we have an urgent need to address anthropogenic global warming. Keep in mind that much of what we know about it comes from the space program and planetary science.
zebonaut
(3,688 posts)If done right. No detours to the moon or asteroid belt.