Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
3. It's inevitable that major players will start to be affected by climate change.
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 12:40 PM
Sep 2015

One major player that has already warned about dire consequences is the military, though they probably want dire consequences to develop because it gives them something to do and makes their minion corporations richer.

What baffles me is why corporations haven't been pushing for management of emissions before this. It was apparent years ago that it would damage their profits.

jalan48

(13,864 posts)
4. Capitalism is about short term profit.
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 12:48 PM
Sep 2015

That's why it's a really bad system for long term planning and dealing with issues like climate change.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
5. So now we have big ag versus big oil and big coal.
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 12:58 PM
Sep 2015

Fist fights at the country club?

Joking aside, maybe now something real will get done.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
6. There are major challenges now for the big food brands
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 01:09 PM
Sep 2015

Coke, mcDonalds, General Mills and others are watching their sales decline year after year. Big has become "bad" as the consumer demands transparency from companies that are designed to obscure their sourcing and practices.

We are heading toward the biggest changes in food production in 100 years.

A third conveyed what her industry feared would be the largest casualty of the public’s “mounting distrust of Big Food”—that shoppers would turn away from them for good. “We understand that increasing numbers of consumers are seeking authentic, genuine food experiences,” said Campbell Soup Co. CEO Denise Morrison, “and we know that they are skeptical of the ability of large, long-established food companies to deliver them.”

And here’s one number to capture that skepticism: An analysis by Moskow found that the top 25 U.S. food and beverage companies have lost an equivalent of $18 billion in market share since 2009. “I would think of them like melting icebergs,” he says. “Every year they become a little less relevant.”

“Their existence is being challenged,” says Edward Jones analyst Jack Russo of the major packaged-food companies. In some ways it’s a strange turn of events. The idea of “processing”—from ancient techniques of salting and curing to the modern arsenal of artificial preservatives—arose to make sure the food we ate didn’t make us sick. Today many fear that it’s the processed food itself that’s making us unhealthy. Indeed, nearly half of the respondents in a recent Bernstein survey say they distrust the food system. Shoppers still value the convenience that food processing offers, says Moskow, “but the pendulum has definitely shifted in their minds. They have more and more questions about why this bread lasts 25 days without going stale.”


To line up with a goal of less greenhouse gas production (and, hopefully, more sequestration) General Mills and others will need a supply chain that uses less petrochemical inputs. Right now tractors use the dirtiest form of diesel, not legal for roadway use. 40% of the ground on earth is farms and those farms are pumping out carbon and methane. With electric tractors and changes in meat production we can make a huge difference in greenhouse gases.

hedda_foil

(16,373 posts)
7. Wow! The TEDx video is awe inspiring.
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 02:12 PM
Sep 2015

I wish our leaders had the vision to make this solution happen. Carter might have. Bernie is our best shot at returning carbon to the soil and (probably) our only shot at it. None of the establishment or fundamentalist types would go there.

Please turn the whole post into an OP in this forum and GD. It's too important to just let it sit here.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
8. He doesn't mention the name of the family who's 2100 acres is being converted to organic
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 03:05 PM
Sep 2015

and sequestration practices -- it's the Rockefellers. They are divesting 100% from petro.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/mar/27/rockefeller-fund-chairman-moral-duty-divest-fossil-fuels

hedda_foil

(16,373 posts)
9. Good for them. Since old John J. ushered in the era of petroleum,
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 04:18 PM
Sep 2015

It's fitting that his foundation should usher in the post fossil fuel era.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
10. The first corporations to start worrying were the insurance companies
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 06:07 PM
Sep 2015

Particularly the ones with weather related coverage.

hatrack

(59,585 posts)
11. Too late!
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 01:57 PM
Sep 2015

Too bad, so sad.

2C at an absolute minimum is already baked in the cake, and that's just what we've done so far.

Shame we didn't get serious about this TWENTY SEVEN FUCKING YEARS AGO when it was first broadly publicized as a real possibility, with scientific evidence pretty strong even then.

Oh well.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Giant Food Corporations A...