Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumJack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Monsanto contracts with Blackwater to invade ExxonMobil.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Kablooie
(18,634 posts)One major player that has already warned about dire consequences is the military, though they probably want dire consequences to develop because it gives them something to do and makes their minion corporations richer.
What baffles me is why corporations haven't been pushing for management of emissions before this. It was apparent years ago that it would damage their profits.
jalan48
(13,864 posts)That's why it's a really bad system for long term planning and dealing with issues like climate change.
drm604
(16,230 posts)Fist fights at the country club?
Joking aside, maybe now something real will get done.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)Coke, mcDonalds, General Mills and others are watching their sales decline year after year. Big has become "bad" as the consumer demands transparency from companies that are designed to obscure their sourcing and practices.
We are heading toward the biggest changes in food production in 100 years.
And heres one number to capture that skepticism: An analysis by Moskow found that the top 25 U.S. food and beverage companies have lost an equivalent of $18 billion in market share since 2009. I would think of them like melting icebergs, he says. Every year they become a little less relevant.
Their existence is being challenged, says Edward Jones analyst Jack Russo of the major packaged-food companies. In some ways its a strange turn of events. The idea of processingfrom ancient techniques of salting and curing to the modern arsenal of artificial preservativesarose to make sure the food we ate didnt make us sick. Today many fear that its the processed food itself thats making us unhealthy. Indeed, nearly half of the respondents in a recent Bernstein survey say they distrust the food system. Shoppers still value the convenience that food processing offers, says Moskow, but the pendulum has definitely shifted in their minds. They have more and more questions about why this bread lasts 25 days without going stale.
To line up with a goal of less greenhouse gas production (and, hopefully, more sequestration) General Mills and others will need a supply chain that uses less petrochemical inputs. Right now tractors use the dirtiest form of diesel, not legal for roadway use. 40% of the ground on earth is farms and those farms are pumping out carbon and methane. With electric tractors and changes in meat production we can make a huge difference in greenhouse gases.
hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)I wish our leaders had the vision to make this solution happen. Carter might have. Bernie is our best shot at returning carbon to the soil and (probably) our only shot at it. None of the establishment or fundamentalist types would go there.
Please turn the whole post into an OP in this forum and GD. It's too important to just let it sit here.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)and sequestration practices -- it's the Rockefellers. They are divesting 100% from petro.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/mar/27/rockefeller-fund-chairman-moral-duty-divest-fossil-fuels
hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)It's fitting that his foundation should usher in the post fossil fuel era.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Particularly the ones with weather related coverage.
hatrack
(59,585 posts)Too bad, so sad.
2C at an absolute minimum is already baked in the cake, and that's just what we've done so far.
Shame we didn't get serious about this TWENTY SEVEN FUCKING YEARS AGO when it was first broadly publicized as a real possibility, with scientific evidence pretty strong even then.
Oh well.