Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumRep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) Calls for Mandatory Labeling of GMO Foods (July 2015)
Jul 23, 2015: Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02) calls for common-sense labeling of GMO foods and urges colleagues to vote against the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, also known as the Deny Americans the Right to Know (DARK) Act, which would roll back years of progress in ensuring that food with genetically engineered ingredients is properly labeled.
"The DARK Act" actually stands in direct contradiction to the wishes of almost 90% of Americans across the country. This legislation makes a mockery of transparency and leaves U.S. consumers in the dark."
H.R. 1599: Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hr1599
Tulsi's Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/tulsipress
More info https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard
Website: https://www.votetulsi.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tulsigabbard
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Amazing how bills are named the opposite of what they contain.
sorechasm
(631 posts)cpwm17
(3,829 posts)Let's try to needlessly scare people into not eating food that has not been demonstrated to be, and there is no bases to think that it can be, unsafe.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science:
http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/AAAS_GM_statement.pdf
The US National Academy of Sciences:
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/oct/24/science/la-sci-gmo-food-safety-20121025
"There's no mystery here," said UCLA plant geneticist Bob Goldberg. "When you put a gene into a plant ... it behaves exactly like any other gene."
Genetically engineered crops have been extensively studied. Hundreds of papers in academic journals have scrutinized data on the health and environmental impacts of the plants. So have several in-depth analyses by independent panels convened by the National Academy of Sciences.
The reports have broadly concluded that genetically modified plants are not only safe but in many respects friendlier to the environment than nonengineered crops grown via conventional farming methods.
The American Medical Association
http://gmopundit.blogspot.com/2012/06/american-medical-association-opposes.html
The council's decision to oppose labeling comes amid California's consideration of legislation that would require genetically modified foods sold in grocery stores to be labeled. Beyond its potential to create unnecessary alarm for consumers, a review by the independent state legislative analyst points out the measure would cost the state and its taxpayers millions of dollars to implement and to pay for lawsuits.
The AMA report is consistent with the findings of a majority of respected scientists, medical professionals and health experts. As the AMA has cited previously, a highly regarded 1987 National Academy of Sciences white paper states there is no evidence that genetically modified foods pose any health risks. The report also reaffirms the council's policy recommendation in a December 2000 report stating "there is no scientific justification for special labeling of genetically modified foods."
Additionally, there have been more than 300 independent medical studies on the health and safety of genetically modified foods. The World Health Organization, the National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association and many others have reached the same determination that foods made using GM ingredients are safe, and in fact are substantially equivalent to conventional alternatives. As a result, the FDA does not require labels on foods with genetically modified ingredients because it acknowledges they may mislead consumers into thinking there could be adverse health effects, which has no basis in scientific evidence.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)ffr
(22,671 posts)If so, what would prevent it from being so here? Money perhaps?
odd_duck
(107 posts)Big business interests are masters of sales and marketing.
So, if there is nothing wrong with GMO's, why don't we see this type of sales pitch?;
"Our brand contains more GMO's than the leading competitors brand"
"Three times more GMO's than the bargain brand"
Eko
(7,351 posts)Seeing as how all of the deaths of humans from food came from non GMO food. Sound good?
Here is a list.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_foodborne_illness_outbreaks_by_death_toll