Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 12:00 PM Jun 2012

Fracking company buys trailer park, evicts 32 families

Last edited Sun Jun 3, 2012, 08:35 PM - Edit history (1)



This is so unfair.

http://www.saveriverdale.com


For Immediate Release: June 2, 2012
Contact: savermhc@gmail.com; Alex Lotorto: 570-269-9589, alotorto@gmail.com; Deb Eck (Resident): 570-772-3335; Kelly Finan: 570-877-2417, Kelly@kellyfinan.com

"Help Us Keep the River in Riverdale": International Day of Solidarity with the Riverdale Community on Monday, June 4

Riverdale residents and supporters are calling for an international day of solidarity action in support of the Riverdale community this Monday, June 4. As relocation resister Deb Eck has put it, you are invited to come down and “help us keep the River in Riverdale.”



Yesterday, residents of the Riverdale Mobile Home Park and supporters set up barricades at the entrance of Riverdale to stop the community from being displaced by Aqua America's plans to construct a fracking water withdrawal facility and send a powerful message to perpetrators of environmental and economic injustice. And so far, it is working. Though Aqua America had announced that it would begin construction on June 1, company representatives were unseen around Riverdale yesterday, and no construction has yet begun.
Now, we need your help.

Residents of the Riverdale Mobile Home Park are going into negotiation with Aqua America PVR[1] on Tuesday. They are demanding the Aqua America PVR allow them to remain in their homes, compensate those residents who have been displaced, and acknowledge the right of return to those who have left but wish to come back. We are calling on you to support Riverdale residents over the next several days and help them hold onto their homes and enter negotiations strong. If you would like to participate in Monday's day of action, this is what we need:

More people. An Aqua America representative stated in today’s newspaper that construction is scheduled to begin soon, possibly on Monday. While about 50 supporters converged on Riverdale yetserday, unfortunately some have had to leave. Our strength is in numbers, and we need you here on Monday to ensure that Riverdale residents can continue to remain in their homes. The encampment is located at 7 Riverdale Lane, Jersey Shore, PA. We can arrange rides to pick up supporters in Danville, Bloomsburg, or Williamsport. Please call (510) 318-1549 if you need to be picked up, and email saveriverdale@gmail.com if you need or can offer a ride.

If you can’t make it to Riverdale, we are calling for solidarity actions against Aqua America PVR and it stakeholders and financiers across the world, as well as the governors of Pennsylvania...read more: http://www.saveriverdale.com/2012/06/help-us-keep-river-in-riverdale-day-of.html


We demand that representatives from the Obama administration and governors Corbett (PA), O'Malley (MD), and Cuomo (NY) recall Aqua America's water withdrawal permit that they approved in March at the next Susquehanna River Basin Commission meeting in Harrisburg June 7th.


..if you are a resident of New York or Maryland, call your governor ((518) 474-8390 for Gov. Cuomo, (410) 974-5041 for Gov. O'Malley) and demand that the permit for Aqua America in Piatt Township, (Jersey Shore) PA be withdrawn at the June 7th Susquehanna River Basin Commission meeting. If your governor is making appearances, please bring your friends and family to their events and offices to ask them if they plan to recall the permit.

...if you are an Obama supporter or campaign worker, call the campaign headquarters (312) 698-3670, White House (202) 456-1111, and Democratic National Committee (202) 863-8000 and remind them that Pennsylvania is a swing state in the November election and that the Obama administration must recall the Aqua America permit in Piatt Township, (Jersey Shore) PA with his vote on the Susquehanna River Basin Commission, June 7th, at their next meeting in Harrisburg.
http://www.saveriverdale.com/p/take-action.html


#SaveRiverdale
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fracking company buys trailer park, evicts 32 families (Original Post) limpyhobbler Jun 2012 OP
How does this differ from renters being asked to move when the property gets sold? dkf Jun 2012 #1
So you side with the gas companies? limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #2
good answer. nt. rbnyc Jun 2012 #4
I side with private property rights. dkf Jun 2012 #5
You support this action by the gas company to evict these people. limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #7
So the property you or I own Riftaxe Jun 2012 #11
What is your point? limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #13
We could argue the requirement for the Riftaxe Jun 2012 #22
Please do not ever speak to me again. limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #25
I'm putting you on ignore. Congradulations, my first one! limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #26
Was this area originally zoned as residential? meanit Jun 2012 #8
the difference is that gejohnston Jun 2012 #3
Yes that is also the danger of owning leasehold property which was very common here at one time dkf Jun 2012 #6
The Pecking Order Syndrome grilled onions Jun 2012 #9
Exactly so. But something tells me these people won't be leaving without a fight. limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #10
That is why we have a legal system in place Riftaxe Jun 2012 #12
The residents and their friends are excercising the legal mechanisms as you suggest. limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #15
"The government has the power to step in and stop this" Riftaxe Jun 2012 #21
Why do you think it is ok for gas drillers to throw little kids and old people out in the street, limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #24
This may be happening to me soon. RebelOne Jun 2012 #14
It seems like the compensation should be more. limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #16
see reply to #15 Riftaxe Jun 2012 #19
Screw property rights. I, for one, am sick of landlords... Comrade_McKenzie Jun 2012 #17
This is not even a landlord, it's a fracking water extraction corporation. limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #18
Who owns the property again? Riftaxe Jun 2012 #20
Why don't you read up on it before spouting off? limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #23
This article is missing a LOT of meaty bonniebgood Jun 2012 #27
Utter Nonsense limpyhobbler Jun 2012 #28
Holy Crap! Aqua America is my "new" water company. EnviroBat Jun 2012 #29
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
1. How does this differ from renters being asked to move when the property gets sold?
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 01:04 PM
Jun 2012

Or would they say an owner doesn't have the right to do that also?

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
2. So you side with the gas companies?
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 01:22 PM
Jun 2012

Yes a gas company has the legal right to evict trailer park people.

That's what all the cries for help are about.

Can you imagine if the state of PA came into a neighborhood of 32 millionaire mansions and ordered them out to make way for drilling?

It's inconceivable.

These gas companies are some of the most powerful people on the planet, so yeah they have the law on their side. I think most people get that.

One edit:
But they also need to get a permit for their drilling/water extraction, and that comes from the government. So that's where we can stop this. It depends whether the Susquehanna River Basin Commission will revoke those permissions on June 7th.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
5. I side with private property rights.
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 02:00 PM
Jun 2012

People also have the right to be obnoxious jerks with their property as long as it doesn't break any laws including zoning laws.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
7. You support this action by the gas company to evict these people.
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 02:17 PM
Jun 2012

Just because they don't own property does not mean you should treat them like human garbage.

What they need is a change in the law or regulation to protect them.

The government has the power to step in and stop this.

Politicians love to talk about "putting people first" and "people over profits".

Here is the chance to stand up for people over corporate profits.

Let's watch the politicians now to see which side they choose.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
11. So the property you or I own
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 06:42 PM
Jun 2012

is up for a popular vote as to what to do?

You do realize where I am going...hint, open history book, read about subjugation of property.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
13. What is your point?
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 06:55 PM
Jun 2012

The government passes laws all the time restricting what people can do with their property.

Also, corporations are NOT people my friend.

This fracking company doesn't have the same property rights as a human being, or at least it shouldn't.

Hint: you sound like a Ron Paul supporter.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
22. We could argue the requirement for the
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 11:59 PM
Jun 2012

legal fiction of corporate pershoon, but i suspect you are clueless about how it came about (it was not in the 20th or 21st century) and involves contract law.

While revocation of that fiction might abrograte you from your debts, it also via backhand allows corporations to slap you with the same level of abrogration.

meanit

(455 posts)
8. Was this area originally zoned as residential?
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 03:34 PM
Jun 2012

Did gas company money get the local authorities to change the zoning laws? Were residents made promises that were not kept and had the rug pulled out from under them?

There could be a lot of different things going on here than just some poor corporation being prevented from doing what they want with the land they "bought and paid for".

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
3. the difference is that
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 01:37 PM
Jun 2012

the residents own the buildings but not the land, so it becomes a matter of moving the mobile homes.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
6. Yes that is also the danger of owning leasehold property which was very common here at one time
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 02:08 PM
Jun 2012

The best these people can do is sue to buy the land but if they don't have the means then this is moot.

This is what my parents had to deal with years ago as the land used to be owned by the Bishop Estate, which is the land formerly owned by a Hawaiian Princess.

Buying a leasehold property is risky and worse than a trailer as you can't move the house to another place. But the terms are set so at least people understand the time frames.

I would never ever buy leasehold property expecting my protests will allow me to stay. That is set up for failure.

grilled onions

(1,957 posts)
9. The Pecking Order Syndrome
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 03:49 PM
Jun 2012

The lower down the financial pole the more likely it seems that your home will be in danger. Corporations love buying up the cheaper land parcels where the budget homes,smaller homes,mobile homes tend to be. You never hear of neighborhoods of the mansion style homes ever getting a group eviction. It's easy to pick on those who don't have connections,lawyers on speed dial or those that would make bad pr for a firm if THEIR home was being threatened.
Many of us seem to only "own" our homes,care for it until the city,state or big business finds a better use for it or the land.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
10. Exactly so. But something tells me these people won't be leaving without a fight.
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 03:58 PM
Jun 2012

Either they will get to stay put, or the company is going to have to offer them a lot more money, a fair amount.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
12. That is why we have a legal system in place
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 06:53 PM
Jun 2012

it is ripe with all sort of things like rights, and laws...and if you don't like the result, we even have mechanisms in place to change them.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
15. The residents and their friends are excercising the legal mechanisms as you suggest.
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 07:00 PM
Jun 2012

They are contacting the government "leaders" for help and protection from the fracking company.

So what is you point?

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
21. "The government has the power to step in and stop this"
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 11:53 PM
Jun 2012

Who owns the property?

what you have stated is a red herring.

Giving you the benefit of doubt, your purpose is disinformation and not to inflame.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
24. Why do you think it is ok for gas drillers to throw little kids and old people out in the street,
Mon Jun 4, 2012, 12:38 AM
Jun 2012

only for the benefit of corporate profits, and without any just compensation?

From where do they get the legal or moral right to do that?

Where do you expect those people to go?

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
14. This may be happening to me soon.
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 06:59 PM
Jun 2012

I live in a mobile home park and I heard that it was sold. The park behind my house evicted all the residents and now there is construction to build condos. There are about 100 homes here and I do not know how they will all be evicted. Many of the homes are quite large double wides. Mine is a single wide, but I have a garage attached. I have been told that the only compensation we will receive is $1,000.

 

Comrade_McKenzie

(2,526 posts)
17. Screw property rights. I, for one, am sick of landlords...
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 07:39 PM
Jun 2012

And the whole concept of land as a commodity, but that's another debate for another day.

A great man once said they always reap what they never sow.

I hope the tenants get what they are fighting for and set a legal precedent that restricts landlords from doing this kind of thing in the future.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
18. This is not even a landlord, it's a fracking water extraction corporation.
Sun Jun 3, 2012, 08:05 PM
Jun 2012

It's a utility company.

This is what they look like:
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=WTR

They bought the trailer park planning to kick the people out. It's all about putting corporate profit first.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
23. Why don't you read up on it before spouting off?
Mon Jun 4, 2012, 12:34 AM
Jun 2012

A water extraction company owns the property.

Now would be a good time to buy stock in this company. They are very powerful right now.
They have the power to throw little kids out in the street and everything.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=WTR

bonniebgood

(950 posts)
27. This article is missing a LOT of meaty
Mon Jun 4, 2012, 08:29 AM
Jun 2012

information. The first person it blames is The Democrats. The Obama Administration, MD Gov. O'malley, and NY Gov. Cuomo. I feel they should be all standing at their own Gov' office.
then What about the "job creators"? less regulations? These companies brings in jobs, jobs, jobs.
The free market must prevail.
With all the fracking, mountintop removal dust storms, gas contaminated drinking water, PA should NOT be a toss-up State.
I would like to see Where PA Gov stands first on this issue.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
28. Utter Nonsense
Mon Jun 4, 2012, 12:45 PM
Jun 2012

This in no way blames the Democrats first. The Susquehanna River Basin Commission has 4 votes, one for each of the 3 governors and one for the federal which President Obama can control.

The PA governor is a Republican, he is in the pocket of the drillers. So why waste time calling him? At least with the Democrats you might be able to influence them.

Beyond that I don't understand what you are talking about.

EnviroBat

(5,290 posts)
29. Holy Crap! Aqua America is my "new" water company.
Mon Jun 4, 2012, 02:52 PM
Jun 2012

They just took over the water service from Ohio American Water, (another crooked organization). God help me, I feel sick...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Fracking company buys tra...