I withdraw my last two OPs. Its apparent Sarandon would never vote for tRump:

[liberalnarb]

[Trust Buster]

1. She made an argument that voting for Trump would be better than voting for Hillary.

[hereforthevoting]

2. Did you watch the video?

I didn't get that from it per se.

[polly7]

3. No, she didn't.

She laughed at trying to be pushed into saying she'd vote for him, and later tweeted out for all those trying so hard to twist her words and intent that she'd never vote for Trump. Watching the video makes it perfectly clear what she stands for. That she believes the status quo is not maintainable equals somehow a 'gleeful vote for Trump!' is the same dirty tact used on Sanders and his supporters since he first started running. Changing the status quo is so terrifying for many they're desperate to deflect - that much is obvious.

A 'revolution' - if Trump got in would turn American politics on it's head - she's right, it would bring about a revolution, and it would be horrible.

As it would for the rest of the world. She realizes that many who don't see hope in status quo candidates will vote for Trump, just as many will vote for Sanders or another candidate.

[Trust Buster]

4. It would bring about a 6-3 Right leaning Supreme Court and no revolution.

It was a foolish comment on her part.

[polly7]

5. What was, that his presidency would bring about a revolution???

How is that foolish? It would!!!

[Trust Buster]

6. A Trump presidency would mean a 6-3 Right leaning Court and no revolution.

Can't you at least admit that she didn't think things through before she spoke ?

[polly7]

7. A political revolution that would destroy your government. THAT is what would happen

with a Trump presidency. Do you think she's stupid enough to believe that's a good thing?

[Trust Buster]

8. She said it in her own words. Yes, I do believe she's stupid enough.

[polly7]

9. You're desperately trying to make her so, that's for sure.

How is someone simply stating many voters will not support the status quo candidates, stupid?

"He's made hatred and racism normal, he's normalized it" I can't even take him seriously." "He's like your drunk uncle at a wedding" who stands up for attention.

........... and yes, he would bring about a crazy, hateful revolution if he ever got in. Do you deny that?

She tweeted out, laughing, "I would never vote for Trump" for all of you trying to twist her words and intent into the same hateful meme as the 'racist', sexist', whatever 'ist' garbage that's been used against Sanders and his supporters since he started running.

She's not the stupid one here. Those trying to use her to scaremonger voters are if they don't realize just how many feel disenfranchised by the status quo and WILL vote for someone else - whoever that is, and will either improve things as she hopes with Sanders, or destroy - as with Trump.

Are millions not flocking towards Trump? I thought I saw they were. Is that not dangerous, and how is it stupid to point it out??

[Trust Buster]

13. No, she stated that a Trump presidency would be such a disaster that it would accelerate the

revolution. She forgot about that minor detail known as the Supreme Court. No revolution will be allowed to happen with a 6-3 Right leaning Supreme Court.

[polly7]

31. You confuse me, are you saying there will be no Trump political revolution?

I saw with my own eyes his hatred, racism, wishes for violence, wanting to upend the status quo in government - he'll have NO ability to do anything at all as president? She's pointed all of that out - you're denying it will happen?

[Trust Buster]

33. You deflect. We were talking about Sarandon's flawed logic.

[polly7]

35. No, her logic is fine. It's yours that seems flawed. nt.

[Trust Buster]

36. A Trump presidency would not accelerate a revolution. It would mean a 6-3 Right leaning

Supreme Court.

[polly7]

37. Ok ........... so it's no big deal.

Maybe not for you, but I worry about the rest of the world he's threatening with his racist, hateful warmongering. Some thought the mindless Bush wouldn't be able to accomplish anything either.

[Trust Buster]

38. That's not what Sarandon said.

[polly7]

39. She said it right - a Trump presidency would hasten a revolution.

You're saying he couldn't.

[Trust Buster]

40. You don't understand what the woman said at all.

[polly7]

41. Oh, I absolutely do. You're trying to twist it into something she 'didn't' say.

You're also denying he'll be able to accomplish anything, right? I believe he'll be able to do a lot - and none of it good.

[Mother Of Four]

46. Polly -

You're trying to reason with someone my Daddy used to call "Mud stuck" That's when you get a big truck stuck in the mud (Truck = idea or thought process / Mud = stubbornness) No matter how you try to help them get unstuck it's always "Nope, my trucks never moving again. Not even a crane will help. Nope not a winch. It's stuck."

No matter what you say, what relevant facts you give them, no matter what creative or polite way you try and reason with them. Their truck is stuck in the mud.

[polly7]

48. Thank you ......... that is the perfect description for it.

[OxQQme]

49. LOL Mo4, my uncle used to use that phrase

I'd completely forgotten that.
Some days it feels like DU has become a mud pit.
Look around and you'll find all brands of trucks stuck.

"Big paddle tires are the only way to get to the other side, Dude."

"Bull puckey! My skinny tired four wheel drive will run circles around you...Dude."

Wheels just a'spinnin'

[Mother Of Four]

50. LOL! nt

[stonecutter357]

12. she was stupid enough to make Pretty Baby.

[polly7]

14. What have you made? nt.

[stonecutter357]

17. What have you made? I am 49 years old and retired so.

In my opinion Pretty Baby is child porn..

[polly7]

18. Never saw it, can't give an opinion except that I doubt she would participate

in child porn.

I've made lots of things.

[stonecutter357]

22. Never saw it? you can look it up.

[polly7]

23. Nah ............ you brought it. You link it and show me the child porn. nt.

[stonecutter357]

24. i am not linking child porn To DU..

[polly7]

25. You accused her of it then tell me to go look it up.

No thanks, I don't search out child porn. I'll just assume you're making it up though.

[alcina]

32. It was an excellent, though disturbing, film

Pretty Baby is a 1978 American historical fiction and drama film directed by Louis Malle, and starring Brooke Shields, Keith Carradine, and Susan Sarandon. The screenplay was written by Polly Platt. The plot focuses on a 12-year-old prostitute in the red-light district of New Orleans at the turn of the 20th century.
The title of the film is inspired by the Tony Jackson song, "Pretty Baby," which is used in the soundtrack. Although the film was mostly praised by critics, it caused significant controversy due to its depiction of child prostitution and the nude scenes of Brooke Shields, who was 12 years old.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Baby_(1978_film)

As the above says, the nude scenes were controversial. But porn? I guess there are some guys who might get off on this film, but I don't think it's what most people think of when they think of porn. Except maybe 49-year-old retirees.

[polly7]

34. Thanks, alcina.

It sounds very interesting and I'm sure was controversial - 12 y/o's ARE being trafficked into child porn and it's something that NEEDS to be brought to attention.

Thanks again.

[alcina]

45. You're most welcome, Miss Polly. /nt

[Brainstormy]

11. It WAS a foolish comment, and my respect

for Sarandon went right into the toilet with it.

[MynameisBlarney]

10. I watched a couple of clips

or her interview with Hayes.
The short one and the extended.
She didn't appear to make that argument to me.

[stonecutter357]

15. Sarandon would vote for Tiny Hands .

She Voted For Ralph Nader

[liberalnarb]

16. I don't like Nader but he's no drumpf.

[polly7]

19. No, that's untrue. She explicitly said she would not. nt.

[stonecutter357]

20. yes she did look it up...

[polly7]

21. I did.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7724753

azurnoir

perhaps you missed it-Sarandon-"LOL that I would ever vote Trump,"

"If you think that it's pragmatic to shore up the status quo right now, then you're not in touch with the status quo," Sarandon said. "The status quo is not working ... I think it's dangerous to think that we can continue the way we are."
Sarandon later clarified on Twitter that she was not saying she would ever vote for Trump.
"LOL that I would ever vote Trump," she tweeted late Tuesday with a link to a story that appeared to characterize her comments that way.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/29/politics/susan-sarandon-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders/index.html

https://twitter.com/SusanSarandon/status/714940487833153536

[riversedge]

27. The video in OP is from January--weathervanes do that. Change directions

[polly7]

29. Her twitter message laughing at the idea she would vote for trump is

not from January, it was from yesterday.

She didn't change direction at all.

[riversedge]

26. That video was made in January. Based on her remarks a fews day ago-she has changed her mind and

has gone over to the #bernieorbust camp.

[polly7]

30. Her twitter laughing at the idea she would vote for Trump is from March 29 - yesterday. nt.

[MynameisBlarney]

43. Almost 70?

No friggin way!!!

During that interview with Hayes, I was thinking to myself, "My god, she's STILL sexy as hell!"

I've had a crush on her since I first saw her in The Rocky Horror Picture Show.

[DrBulldog]

42. The point Susan made in her interview was that Hillary was now stooping as low as Donald . . .

. . . and that is making voters STOP AND HESITATE AND THINK. The choice in the fall could be between a inveterate liar and a pathological liar - and people will be asking themselves: what is the difference?

[jalan48]

44. Oh the Drama!

Did or didn't Susan say she would vote for Trump. Meanwhile, has Hillary released those Goldman Sachs transcripts yet? I would say that's far more important than what Sarandon thinks.