Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1987 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well, There's Finally A Real Scandal In This Election... (Original Post)
thomhartmann
Sep 2016
OP
onecaliberal
(32,852 posts)1. Precisely! When will the investigation begin?
Botany
(70,501 posts)2. The only crime in "the Hillary email scandal" is the abuse of power by republicans and our media
Thom
Judicial watch were behind the impeachment of Bill Clinton for a b.j. and pushing
for Obama's "long form birth certificate" after the State of Hawaii released Barack
Obama short form birth certificate. They are a right wing witch hunting group but
that does not stop Joe Scarborough and CNN from pushing their lies every morning.
Judicial Watch's Pursuit of Clinton Goes Too Far
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-09-04/judicial-watch-s-pursuit-of-clinton-goes-too-far
The Clintons have been subject to fishing expeditions before, but why is a federal court making Hillary Clinton give sworn responses now to questions about her use of a private e-mail server back when she was secretary of state? This all stems from a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by a conservative group seeking State Department information about Clintons aide Huma Abedin. With a series of permissive rulings, the judge has allowed the suit to get out of hand. Its now an inquiry into Clintons motives in using her private server -- something well beyond the contemplation of the freedom of information laws.
Judicial Watch, which initiated the suit, is a founding member of Hillary Clintons vast right-wing conspiracy. Founded by the lawyer Larry Klayman and given early funding by conservative billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife (remember him?), it brought some choice lawsuits against Bill Clinton back in the 1990s. Its favored method is the FOIA suit.
The latest iteration was filed in 2013 against the State Department, seeking information about the employment of Abedin, at one time Clintons deputy chief of staff at State and a magnet for Clinton conspiracy theorists.
snip
Thats how the current suit started -- and for a moment, ended. After the State Department gave Judicial Watch the documents it was seeking, the two sides agreed to have the case dismissed in 2014.
Judicial watch were behind the impeachment of Bill Clinton for a b.j. and pushing
for Obama's "long form birth certificate" after the State of Hawaii released Barack
Obama short form birth certificate. They are a right wing witch hunting group but
that does not stop Joe Scarborough and CNN from pushing their lies every morning.
Judicial Watch's Pursuit of Clinton Goes Too Far
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-09-04/judicial-watch-s-pursuit-of-clinton-goes-too-far
The Clintons have been subject to fishing expeditions before, but why is a federal court making Hillary Clinton give sworn responses now to questions about her use of a private e-mail server back when she was secretary of state? This all stems from a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by a conservative group seeking State Department information about Clintons aide Huma Abedin. With a series of permissive rulings, the judge has allowed the suit to get out of hand. Its now an inquiry into Clintons motives in using her private server -- something well beyond the contemplation of the freedom of information laws.
Judicial Watch, which initiated the suit, is a founding member of Hillary Clintons vast right-wing conspiracy. Founded by the lawyer Larry Klayman and given early funding by conservative billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife (remember him?), it brought some choice lawsuits against Bill Clinton back in the 1990s. Its favored method is the FOIA suit.
The latest iteration was filed in 2013 against the State Department, seeking information about the employment of Abedin, at one time Clintons deputy chief of staff at State and a magnet for Clinton conspiracy theorists.
snip
Thats how the current suit started -- and for a moment, ended. After the State Department gave Judicial Watch the documents it was seeking, the two sides agreed to have the case dismissed in 2014.