Democrats should push John Roberts for a bench warrant to force Trump's testimony in the Senate:

[turbinetree]

[njhoneybadger]

1. Good luck with the "Corporations are people to destroy unions guy"

[PSPS]

2. Who are these people? Roberts' role is only ceremonial. He can't issue subpoenas or warrants.

[Cartaphelius]

3. Ummm... Correct me if I am wrong

but isn't Roberts the JUDGE and as such, can require
testimony from any witness in the furtherance of a
fact- based trial?

Not to mention that Roberts doesn't assume his role
until the Articles of Impeachment are presented to
the Senate.

So, as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, he
could compel Trump's testimony. Not that he will
of course. That would give the Supremes the chance
to determine another presidency in our lifetimes.

[PSPS]

4. Roberts' role is not as a judge. He merely "presides." Moscow mitch makes the rules.

[SWBTATTReg]

5. rump has been crowing about testifying etc., he shouldn't be served w/ a warrent to testify, if...

he's wanting to clear his name. Coward...he won't either (testify).

[cstanleytech]

6. The 5th amendment might come into play there. The ones that should be compelled

are the witnesses that Trump is obstructing from testifying.