Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumThree former Oath Keepers/military veterans testified at trial today. Here's why it left me hopeful
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 855 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Three former Oath Keepers/military veterans testified at trial today. Here's why it left me hopeful (Original Post)
ItsjustMe
Oct 2022
OP
Why would someone want to overturn the results of a free and fair election in the USA
BOSSHOG
Oct 2022
#1
They agree with your interpretation of oath but disagree on your premise that it was free and fair
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 2022
#3
BOSSHOG
(37,124 posts)1. Why would someone want to overturn the results of a free and fair election in the USA
IF THEY WERE KEEPING THEIR OATH? Maybe that brilliant statesperson marge Greene can splain it to me.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,052 posts)3. They agree with your interpretation of oath but disagree on your premise that it was free and fair
You blithely slid over your premise when it is central to the issue.
You and I will undoubtedly agree that they can have beliefs of their own, but they are not entitled to their own set of facts. They would even agree with that, but dispute the facts. The core problem is that their fact-checking is shitty as hell due to a lack of critical thinking skills.
I don't know the solution to that, but I am sure it is not simple.
If you truly believed that, say, a million RW thugs had stolen and tampered with ballot boxes and election machines to steal an election blatantly when it had been won by our side by, say, 6 million votes and a couple dozen electoral votes, then you'd be "up in arms" too, so to speak. You'd be considering joining mass actions in the streets or DC or even organizing them.
Well, from their perspective, those are the "facts" they believe. They are convinced that tRump got 5 to 10 million more votes than Biden. Likewise they believe Pence could have turned the election over to tRump on Jan 6 while we know it is nonsense.
It's a problem.
brush
(53,925 posts)2. Hope Kirshner realizes that's only 3 out of how many...
who stayed to help stage the attempted coup.
Don't give those white supremacist asshole undeserved breaks.