Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TrogL

(32,822 posts)
Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:29 PM Jun 2012

What's this shit about Wallenda being the first person to walk across Niagara Falls on a tightrope?

Has everybody forgotten Blondin and half a dozen other people? They reason they banned it was because it was turning into a daily circus.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's this shit about Wallenda being the first person to walk across Niagara Falls on a tightrope? (Original Post) TrogL Jun 2012 OP
Here.... hlthe2b Jun 2012 #1
"...without a net" is an important part of the thrillseeker world. Iggo Jun 2012 #2
He still made it without falling treestar Jun 2012 #3
A death-defying stunt should be a death-defying stunt... Iggo Jun 2012 #4
Well this was not a death defying stunt treestar Jun 2012 #5

hlthe2b

(102,276 posts)
1. Here....
Sat Jun 16, 2012, 11:33 PM
Jun 2012
More than 150 years ago, French aerialist Charles Blondin, known as "The Great Blondin," famously walked a high wire strung farther down the Niagara gorge, but a trek over the brink of the falls had never before been attempted.


http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/06/16/uk-usa-niagara-highwire-idUKBRE85F0LK20120616


Apparently, he wants to do the Grand Canyon next. I'll watch the instant reply after I hear he's been successful.

Iggo

(47,552 posts)
2. "...without a net" is an important part of the thrillseeker world.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 10:38 AM
Jun 2012

And that safety tether is no different than working with a net. Once they told him he had to be tethered, he should have just passed.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
3. He still made it without falling
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 11:17 AM
Jun 2012

which is the same thing - why should the penalty of a slip be death? He'd be embarrassed but not dead. I'm all for that. As to the feat of staying on the wire, that's still the same and amazing.

Iggo

(47,552 posts)
4. A death-defying stunt should be a death-defying stunt...
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 12:15 PM
Jun 2012

...otherwise it's not a death-defying stunt.

That's all I'm really saying.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
5. Well this was not a death defying stunt
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 02:42 PM
Jun 2012

It was a stunt. Still an accomplishment. I don't see why such things needs invoke a risk of death. It's silly and a potential waste of a life. He still walked over a wire for a long length and did a few "tricks" along the way.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»What's this shit about Wa...