Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brain work, geometry edition (Original Post) Ptah Apr 2023 OP
48 inches. A large one of 48" and a much smaller in one of the corners. yonder Apr 2023 #1
Yes, I meant to say they are the same size. Ptah Apr 2023 #2
Sorry for the smart ass answer....just testing for a trick question. yonder Apr 2023 #3
It was a clever answer. Ptah Apr 2023 #4
If it is two identical circles, then RockRaven Apr 2023 #5
That's How I Did It ProfessorGAC Apr 2023 #14
Well done. Ptah Apr 2023 #17
Impressive! You solved it in less than 30 minutes' Ptah Apr 2023 #16
If I remember my Pythagorean Theorem gratuitous Apr 2023 #6
That would put much of the circles outside of the square. Ptah Apr 2023 #8
33.94? nt intrepidity Apr 2023 #7
That would put much of the circles outside of the square. Ptah Apr 2023 #9
Oops yeah I see my mistake now doh nt intrepidity Apr 2023 #12
33.94 is too large as it creates a diameter from the midpoint of the hypotenuse yonder Apr 2023 #10
Correct, 28.1. Ptah Apr 2023 #18
So....what's the equation, exactly? nt intrepidity Apr 2023 #19
RockRaven correctly wrote it like this: Ptah Apr 2023 #20
I mean, using the variable R and the known 48. nt intrepidity Apr 2023 #21
Sure: Ptah Apr 2023 #22
I must be dense intrepidity Apr 2023 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author yonder Apr 2023 #11
27? intrepidity Apr 2023 #13
Beyond my ability Jack the Greater Apr 2023 #15

yonder

(9,669 posts)
1. 48 inches. A large one of 48" and a much smaller in one of the corners.
Tue Apr 11, 2023, 02:45 PM
Apr 2023

That answers the question accurately I think. If the circles are to be the same size as shown, I'm thinking.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
6. If I remember my Pythagorean Theorem
Tue Apr 11, 2023, 03:51 PM
Apr 2023

A square of 48 inches per side would yield a diagonal of 67.88 inches, which would accommodate two circles of diameter 33.94 inches.

yonder

(9,669 posts)
10. 33.94 is too large as it creates a diameter from the midpoint of the hypotenuse
Tue Apr 11, 2023, 04:44 PM
Apr 2023

to the intersection of the tangents. The diameter is going to be smaller in the neighborhood of 28 and change but I’m wrestling with how to calc it.

Edit: what the OP just said.

Ptah

(33,034 posts)
20. RockRaven correctly wrote it like this:
Wed Apr 12, 2023, 09:06 PM
Apr 2023
RockRaven (12,587 posts)
5. If it is two identical circles, then

I think the diameter would be equal to 48/(1+1/√2)


https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1018&pid=1803704

intrepidity

(7,331 posts)
23. I must be dense
Wed Apr 12, 2023, 09:58 PM
Apr 2023

If we call the dashed line "s" then

2R + s = 48
or
s = 48 - 2R

We know that, for hypoteneus h:

h^2 = 2s^2
and
h = 2R
so
4R^2 = 2s^2

Since
s = 48 - 2R
then
4R^2 = 2(48-2R)^2

Ah, ok, now I see.

Response to Ptah (Original post)

intrepidity

(7,331 posts)
13. 27?
Tue Apr 11, 2023, 06:27 PM
Apr 2023

Without using formulas, so probably wrong.

Logic is: 24 is too small, 30 is too big, so split the difference.

Jack the Greater

(601 posts)
15. Beyond my ability
Tue Apr 11, 2023, 08:33 PM
Apr 2023

RockRaven's answer seems convincing, but I am not familiar with the math to get to it. Square root of 2 was never my forte

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Brain work, geometry edit...