Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsMatthews just said outlawing sodomy is an invasive policy. Wouldn't it be a non-invasive policy?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1205 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Matthews just said outlawing sodomy is an invasive policy. Wouldn't it be a non-invasive policy? (Original Post)
ohiosmith
Jan 2012
OP
Dr. Strange
(25,923 posts)1. Maybe Matthews does it differently than you do.
ohiosmith
(24,262 posts)2. Too disturbing to think about.
guitar man
(15,996 posts)3. I don't know, but
Wouldn't ridding the world of sodomy also rid us of Santorum?
ohiosmith
(24,262 posts)4. Unfortunately he's just one a-hole among many.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)5. someone has got to find the texas legislators discussing this. it is a hoot.
i will try. but the funniest on state floor.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)6. molly ivans of course. starts with leg at 4:37
UTUSN
(70,740 posts)7. He's always a mixed up person, a RAYGUN lover n/t