The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsOk...here's one that is SURE to cause a shit storm.....IYO... what are the most over rated bands...
or musical artists of all time. I'll get the fireworks going with these two
The Beatles
The Grateful Dead
jonno99
(2,620 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)jonno99
(2,620 posts)decided against it because it sounded too much like a breakfast cereal.
clarice
(5,504 posts)jonno99
(2,620 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Tobin S.
(10,418 posts)But they must have hit a nerve in the collective consciousness because they changed rock and roll.
clarice
(5,504 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)Jimmy Buffett
Bon Jovi, Aerosmith, the Police.
clarice
(5,504 posts)jonno99
(2,620 posts)ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)3 of four they were dreadful. Once, in Seattle 75, they had the first lasers I ever saw and were pretty amazing. But, not THAT amazing.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)I've come across who sound much better on the "album" - apparently Zeppelin is one of those(?).
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)I got to where I prefer the live versions of most songs. Take into account most live audience recordings are on tape from often less-than-ideal locations and I STILL like the live versions better. There are some terrific soundboards out there too.
but warts and all, Jimmy was hitting the smack pretty hard for a while there and they did have some lazy shows. Jonesy and Bonham were almost always on point. Plant had voice problems on and off.
I've seen Page and Plant together and separately many times since the 80s and they've always been terrific live but, by then, they were past most of their drugs and alcohol problems. I've seen JPJ once and that was easily one of the most incredible musical experiences I've ever had. That dude can play most any stringed instrument.
megahertz
(126 posts)clarice
(5,504 posts)Coventina
(27,217 posts)Well, OK, I exaggerate, but their music makes my skin crawl.
Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)Maybe that is because I was a teenager then. I mostly liked Nirvana back then for the new music. I actually had a crush on Kurt Cobain back then (that shows what I odd ball I am). I know someone said Nirvana is over rated. I don't care how anyone else rates the bands I like. I like them because I do. I am still fond of Nirvana because they remind me of the 90's and good times being a teenager.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)musical (and film) creativity and innovations, and their indisputable influence on the entire society, from music (ushering in the entire British Invasion) to movies (another British Invasion) to clothing to hairstyles to the acceptance of Transcendental Meditation to TODAY STILL.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,228 posts)I never got why they were so popular.
Laffy Kat
(16,390 posts)Their lyrics made zero sense and sounded like bad poems written by love-sick teenage boys during study hall. Sorry, TRUE.
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)Most of their lyrics were pretty abstract, and I can't think of any love songs. Which songs are you thinking of?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,483 posts)...at the REM concert; that's me in the corner.
WillyBrandt
(3,892 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)True Dough
(17,352 posts)The Eagles. I don't absolutely detest all their music, but if I hear most of their songs come on I'll reach for the volume or skip button or something. They're overrated, IMO.
Hey, clarice said she was expecting a shit storm. Glad to help kick up the swirling feces!
Coventina
(27,217 posts)Still Blue in PDX
(1,999 posts)Fix The Stupid
(949 posts)If you can, try and find some footage (very hard to find) of their Hell Freezes over reunion MTV gig...
Master musicians - every one of them.
They sound so good live its ridiculous.
Henley's voice is simply amazing.
Felders playing his ass off, so is Walsh.
They had a chemistry you cannot deny. Great songwriters as well...
I think they were the complete package. No studio tricks...
But I do get why people feel that way, I did as well, until I dug into their stuff and really started listening to it.
It helps that I'm a guitar player as well - can appreciate the simpleness of their songs and their playing style.
LuckyLib
(6,821 posts)talented at everything they do. Few groups could come back after 14 years and do that well.
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)I can take or leave the Eagles, but I will say that in this post-Lebowski era, liking The Eagles has become the contrarian position.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,924 posts)PassingFair
(22,434 posts)Boring and sanctimonious.
Also, Chicago.... Can. Not. Listen. To.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)How many times can they record variations of the same song? Sooooo boring.
Coventina
(27,217 posts)Don't know why all of them start with "R", that's weird!!
True Dough
(17,352 posts)Rush and the RHCP might be overrated as well, but I like some of their tunes.
progressoid
(50,005 posts)Just doesn't work for me. Maybe I'm not stoned enough?
Fix The Stupid
(949 posts)Absolute torture on the ears...
I don't get why anyone can be so gung-ho for either of them...
Springsteen's songs all sound the same. Terrible live. Can't pull it off live, then gtfo.
Studio musicians - can't stand them.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,228 posts)Archae
(46,363 posts)He mumbles far too often.
Just listen to "Born To Run."
95% of that song is unintelligible.
jmowreader
(50,571 posts)A ton of bands have changed their lineups. I fucking hate when a band produces a really good song, and people start saying "oh, they've been bloody awful since Jack Schitt got kicked out." And then you discover Jack Schitt played only on their first album and it got worse reviews than The Gospel According to Spinal Tap.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)To me, over-rated means the band was wildly popular for no good reason. Bad musicians who were popular anyway. Most of what I'm seeing in this thread is just "I don't like them".
I can't stand Tool but I can't deny their musicianship. I think they are incredibly talented, I just don't like their songs. So I wouldn't call them overrated.
I love the Ramones but let's be real, they could barely play when they first started and learned just enough as they went along to get through albums and shows. Punk wasn't about virtuosity though so it didn't matter to me that they started out out pretty rough. They got good enough but I think wherever they are rated highly it's for what they meant rather than how they played.
I don't think there is a rating high enough to accurately describe how much I love Led Zeppelin. Every single song they ever did means something to me. (counting covers too) They were talented musicians before they ever formed LZ and I love everything they've done and most of what they've done since LZ.
Same goes for Rush, Pink Floyd, Napalm Death and Carcass.
I never liked Nirvana (or any of the 90s grunge really) but I sure love the effin hell out of Dave Grohl.
I guess it's all a matter of perspective so I don't know if this post is worth anything lol. Metallica through Master of Puppets was under-rated. Everything after was highly over-rated.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,228 posts)Geddy Lee's voice is like fingernails on a chalkboard for me.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)I know a lot of folks who don't like his voice and many of them are wonderful people anyway.
pressbox69
(2,252 posts)BOSTON
progressoid
(50,005 posts)KISS played the Iowa state fair this year. My daughter wanted to know why I wasn't going!
I told her that I hate them more now than I did in high school.
lindysalsagal
(20,782 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)First song off their first album! If this ain't rock 'n' roll, what is?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,483 posts)Orrex
(63,247 posts)100% correct.
progressoid
(50,005 posts)Prepackaged corporate schlock.
Liberal Jesus Freak
(1,451 posts)Saw them live in 1976. Definitely a studio band...live, they sucked.
lastlib
(23,352 posts)Beatles cannot be over-rated, simply because of their total cultural impact. No other band anywhere, anytime, can match them.
astral
(2,531 posts)you have heard very little of their music.
Top of my off'the'top'of'my'head list:
WILLIE NELSON
BARRY MANILOW
Wolf Frankula
(3,602 posts)Grateful Dead live was frequently boring. Repetitious stupid jamming with stoners gushing, "Oh wow, it's the Dead."
Wolf
ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)That's why the band sold more tickets than any band. More shows, more songs. Why they sell the shit out of the archives. And have bands covering their live shows doing well.
Sorry, but the Dead were America's greatest band. Look at every top touring act on the road, filling stadiums and amphitheatres across the country all have a strong Grateful Dead connection. The influence will exist forever.
Kali
(55,027 posts)martin mike
(82 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)I get absolutely nothing out of listening to them other than irritated.
This ended up a reply to you RandySF, meant for the main thread (sorry).
But I wholeheartedly agree with you about U2. They need to stop.
Texasgal
(17,049 posts)but my pick Is Adele.
Nice voice and all that but her songs are slow and depressing. Everything she sings sounds the same.
Skittles
(153,245 posts)I cannot imagine listening to an entire album of Adele
Generic Brad
(14,276 posts)While I respect everyone's musical opinions, I cannot give credence to any who think Nickleback deserves a pass on this.
Dr. Strange
(25,927 posts)Saying that Nickelback sucks is still over-rating them!
Beaverhausen
(24,472 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)I don't get their appeal at all.
Orrex
(63,247 posts)Horrible, horrible horrible.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Skittles
(153,245 posts)but whenever anyone says The Beatles were overrated, I know they are clueless
Archae
(46,363 posts)Everything that could suck about a band, does.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,228 posts)I never was a Parrothead, or a Dead Head for that matter. I have experienced the fun of really being into a band, traveling to shows and making friends with other fans. It was a blast.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,224 posts)The songs were too overproduced and came off almost novelty like.
KISS was a marketing ploy in the form of a mediocre cosplay rock band.
ABBA is awful, but gets a lot of support from drunken wedding guests.
Michael Jackson was a much, much better dancer than he ever was a singer....and his overall weirdness detracted from him as a whole. I know it might come off as too soon, but I'd say the same thing about Prince.
cleveramerican
(2,895 posts)ret5hd
(20,540 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)chknltl
(10,558 posts)NNadir
(33,580 posts)...but I don't actually believe it. It may have been a hallucination.