Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
3. The first time I heard it, I thought the speaker'd had a stroke mid-sentence
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 11:26 AM
Jul 2017

It's a trendy corporate buzz-phrase, and whatever its etymology, I find it nauseatingly contrived and artificial.

SCantiGOP

(13,869 posts)
13. That's how you get your "deliverables"
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 03:31 PM
Jul 2017

First time I heard that phrase I thought it was dumb; didn't know that it would be a common phrase.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
2. Let's touch base later and then we can redouble our efforts...
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 10:00 AM
Jul 2017

If that won't get us zapped by the Galactic Airforce of Uranus, nothing will.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
5. Never heard that.
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 12:09 PM
Jul 2017

I'm sick of "cray" and "welp".

Somehow people think those words make them sound cool I guess.

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
6. "welp" has been around for decades, alas, and I agree with you.
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 12:17 PM
Jul 2017

I don't mind words that arise through organic processes, since that's how language works, but something in the focus-grouped tone of corporate trend-speak makes me feel all stabby.

Paladin

(28,254 posts)
8. Coined by the same creep who came up with "servant leadership," no doubt.
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 12:35 PM
Jul 2017

Is it a clunky-assed way of saying "What I'm asking is...."? I'm with you: planetary destruction is appropriate retribution.

frogmarch

(12,153 posts)
9. What does it mean?
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 01:50 PM
Jul 2017

Does it mean "my question for you/request of you (is...)" ?

I'd never heard of it before.

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
10. You'd identified it exactly
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 02:00 PM
Jul 2017

I could even see it as "my task for you."

But this new formulation--which I've heard from clients nationwide, sadly--is an abomination.

SCantiGOP

(13,869 posts)
15. Oh, you reminded me
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 03:34 PM
Jul 2017

how much I hated the past tense of 'task,' as in "I was tasked with proofing the report." It's also a very difficult word to pronounce in a hurry, it almost ends up as three syllables.

Aristus

(66,327 posts)
12. I despise it too, for the same reason: meaningless, corporate management-seminar speak.
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 02:09 PM
Jul 2017

Just talk, for the love of God...

ploppy

(2,162 posts)
16. I ignore people when they talk to me like that.
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 04:07 PM
Jul 2017

Reach out, circle back, my ask of you, employee engagement. Talk like a person and I will get back to you!

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
17. Never heard that one before
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 04:59 PM
Jul 2017

I have a particular loathing for "Hating on" myself. I know English is descriptive not proscriptive but that's no excuse for illogical constructions like "I could care less" and "head over heels". English is probably the richest language on earth, and its abuse causes me no end of irritations.

A good round of mandatory floggings might bring about changes. I would support any candidate running on such a platform.

Glorfindel

(9,729 posts)
20. Hear, hear! (Not "Here, here!")
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 07:04 PM
Jul 2017

And my special favorite lately: Confusing "reign in" with "rein in." Let the floggings begin!

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Whoever coined the phrase...