Photography
Related: About this forumWell, I did an experimental photo shoot tonight...
Let me know what you think, good or bad!
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,584 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,584 posts)Part of it is what kind of camera you have. Mine allows all sorts of settings to be used.......normally I'm not adventurous, but tonight I felt like experimenting...and it paid off!
applegrove
(118,620 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,584 posts)It's nearly full. You could call it a waxing gibbous moon.
Waxing=getting nearly full. After it gets full, and proceeds to look smaller, we say it's waning.
Gibbous=not full yet, or after having been full. Any phase where the moon looks odd or oblong.
applegrove
(118,620 posts)Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)I like the tones.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,584 posts)It means quite a lot to old amateur me.
Mira
(22,380 posts)out of my mind, actually. That was very successful, I know you are proud as you should be. The colors are fabulous.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,584 posts)I am (as we say) over the moon!
It was completely experimental. I've never even played with the manual setting before. I don't actually know what it does, exactly. But my results knocked my socks off!
Mira
(22,380 posts)Until now.
I have a fine camera, and a setting that says automatic. Whatever success I have with photos is in choosing subjects, and in cropping. I'm an unabashed amateur, but I take some good photos.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,584 posts)I crop judiciously and I also have a very simple Photoshop program that I routinely use.
I love taking pictures! And every now and then, I get a good one.
Dyedinthewoolliberal
(15,566 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,584 posts)Actually, I think the photo itself has the settings in the file where I stored it.
I'll check!
But really I want to improve on it!
Monday is the full moon and the solstice, so I want to see if I can do that moon more beautifully!
mnhtnbb
(31,382 posts)We've had a lot of clouds the last couple of nights. Didn't even know that moon was up there?
Nice detail and color!
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,584 posts)I was just shooting it in my usual auto no flash, and the little photo on the camera's back looked awful. So I thought, WTH, let's try some other setting. And the rest is history!
I could not believe the detail!
Mz Pip
(27,439 posts)I don't have much luck with moon shots.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,584 posts)I just put the camera on "manual" and let it do the rest. Literally, that was all.
If your camera allows this setting, you should try it. You do need a long lens, if you have one.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Nice color.
Good placement in the frame.
I would probably crop it tighter while maintaining everything about the presentation.
Like most moon shots, it could probably use a little post processing love for sharpness and contrast (hard to tell at this size).
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,584 posts)I hear you about the cropping...I like to leave a little space. This time, it seemed as though the moon was shining to the right, so I cropped it in that direction.
My very primitive photoshop program doesn't have a sharpening feature, alas, and the more advanced programs are so complex that I am completely confused as to how to use them! I did use the contrast function. God knows I have much to learn!
Thanks for coming by and for your comments.