Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 02:24 PM Sep 2015

This is what a $350,000 house in San Francisco looks like



http://fusion.net/story/199332/this-is-what-a-350000-house-in-san-francisco-looks-like/

You may have heard that housing prices in the Bay Area are at astronomical, crazy, start-the-worker’s-revolution-tomorrow levels. The average asking rent for an apartment in San Francisco is $3,458 (not a typo!) and the median home price is hovering somewhere over a million dollars. To afford to live comfortably in San Francisco, estimates suggest you need to earn at least $200,000 a year.

How bad is San Francisco’s housing market? It’s so bad that this house, a dilapidated lean-to in the city’s Outer Mission district, was just listed for sale for $350,000.

The house, which has two bedrooms and one bathroom and is located on De Long Street in the Outer Mission, is 765 square feet. The listing on ZipRealty describes it as a “fixer,” and a “distinguished home in need of work.” According to Zillow, it last sold in January 1980 for $51,500.

$350,000 may not be that expensive for San Francisco these days, given that whoever buys this house will likely tear it down and use the land to build a much nicer, more twee tiny house. Still, when a complete, condemnable dump is on the market for a third of a million dollars, it’s clear that money has lost all meaning.


12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
1. location location location
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 02:30 PM
Sep 2015

the problem of property values skyrocketing in SF is directly attributable to poor tax policy. if we still had a 90% bracket, this problem wouldn't exist and the bottom 90% could afford to live there.

question everything

(47,487 posts)
10. That was my reaction too. No doubt the land is worth that much
Sun Sep 20, 2015, 04:59 PM
Sep 2015

and a buyer can build a million dollar new hours..

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
3. But as the article points out you would be really paying for the property.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 02:33 PM
Sep 2015

How much do similar vacant lots go for?

In this case tearing down and removing the house might actually increase the value of the property.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
4. I don't have a problem with dilapidated fixers if the land it's on is worth owning.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 02:34 PM
Sep 2015

That is not $350,000 worth of land to me unless it has a spectacular view.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
6. SF needs to change zoning to allow higher desity.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 03:41 PM
Sep 2015

If there are more people that want to live there than houses, prices will go up. The solution is to add more places to live.

Most cities expand outward, but that is not possible in SF.

The solution is go up. A lot of hostorical districts only allpw 4 stories or less and have a low density. Why not raise that? Soil in SF makes building more difficult, and I think there should be some limits to height, but that is the only thing that is going to help.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
7. It is already the second-densest city in the U.S. behind NYC.
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 04:03 PM
Sep 2015

Or third if you count Hoboken, NJ as a "city".

petronius

(26,602 posts)
8. Disappointed there were no pics of the interior
Fri Sep 18, 2015, 06:29 PM
Sep 2015

I'd love to see the inside of a "distinguished" $350k SF home...

mackerel

(4,412 posts)
11. An empty lot of similar square footage would still go for less. When you buy a home
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 12:05 AM
Sep 2015

even if it's condemned you already have grandfathered in water line & other utilities. You don't have to get as many permits. If they use the same floor plan you don't need that many permits at all. The permit process in the city if awful.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
12. San Francisco earthquake shack sells for $408,000
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 05:14 PM
Oct 2015
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/san-francisco-shack-starting-at-350000-2015-09-29

If you want an idea of how red-hot the San Francisco real estate market is, you don’t need to look further than 16 De Long Street in San Francisco, where this tiny run-down shack built after the Great San Francisco Earthquake more than 100 years ago — just sold for northward of $400,000, more than its asking price.

The 1906 single-story Craftsman home in San Francisco’s Outer Mission needs some work. OK, a lot of work. But the price is what has people talking. The house, which was listed for $350,000 in September just sold this week for $408,000, nearly 17% above the asking price. With two bedrooms, one bath and a mere 765 square feet — it’s about the size of a hotel suite.“Distinguished home in need of work,” is how Vanguard Properties agent Brian Tran described it.

“We keep an eye out for distressed homes, but this one went above and beyond,” said Tran in an interview. Tran said the house spent just 10 days on the market before four all-cash offers rolled in. “It took a bit longer to close because the owner actually wanted to slow down and say her good-byes to the property,” said Tran. “She was very attached to the home,” he said.

Tran said the new buyers will keep the property as it is and remodel it. “I am very excited to see how the project will turn out,” he said.


Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»This is what a $350,000 h...