Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
District of Columbia
Related: About this forumCongressman: It Should Definitely Be Legal To Discriminate Based On Reproductive Choices In D.C.
Congressman: It Should Definitely Be Legal To Discriminate Based On Reproductive Choices In D.C.
BY RACHEL KURZIUS IN NEWS ON AUG 28, 2017 4:09 PM
Stop me if you've heard this one before. A person voted into office by constituents more than 800 miles away has decided that he needs to stymie a law passed by D.C. politicians that will only affect residents of the District.
Meet Congressman Gary Palmer, a Republican representing Alabama's 6th District. Ever since he made it to Capitol Hill in 2015, he's made a habit out of trying to block the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Act.
The law makes it illegal for employers to discriminate against workers based on their reproductive health choices, meaning a person can't get fired for, say, being on birth control or getting an abortion.
....
Palmer is at it again. Late last week, he submitted a rider to a House appropriations bill to block funding for the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Act. It joins efforts to control D.C.'s implementation of its physician-assisted death bill, along with amendments that block D.C. budget autonomy, prevent spending local funds on abortion, and stop D.C. from crafting regulations regarding the sale of marijuana.
BY RACHEL KURZIUS IN NEWS ON AUG 28, 2017 4:09 PM
Stop me if you've heard this one before. A person voted into office by constituents more than 800 miles away has decided that he needs to stymie a law passed by D.C. politicians that will only affect residents of the District.
Meet Congressman Gary Palmer, a Republican representing Alabama's 6th District. Ever since he made it to Capitol Hill in 2015, he's made a habit out of trying to block the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Act.
The law makes it illegal for employers to discriminate against workers based on their reproductive health choices, meaning a person can't get fired for, say, being on birth control or getting an abortion.
....
Palmer is at it again. Late last week, he submitted a rider to a House appropriations bill to block funding for the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Act. It joins efforts to control D.C.'s implementation of its physician-assisted death bill, along with amendments that block D.C. budget autonomy, prevent spending local funds on abortion, and stop D.C. from crafting regulations regarding the sale of marijuana.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 2343 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congressman: It Should Definitely Be Legal To Discriminate Based On Reproductive Choices In D.C. (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2017
OP
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)1. Do we have a screaming smilie?
A pulling hair out smile? A fuck you all to hell smilie? I've had it with these pieces of crap. Just had it.
elleng
(131,391 posts)2. So have I had it, and glad I and my adult daughters no longer live in DC
for reasons such as this.
BigmanPigman
(51,659 posts)3. My niece attends college in DC and was telling me about
DC wanting to have its own reps to Congress. Is this an example why?