Create new account | My Profile | My Account | My Bookmarks | My Inbox | Help | Log in

Google search

Advanced search

HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Places » U.S. » Michigan (Group) » Convicted With No Evidenc...

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 10:20 AM

Star Member marmar (72,481 posts)

Convicted With No Evidence by an All-White Jury, Black Community Leader Faces Life in Prison


(Truthout) As reports escalate of police assaults and murder of unarmed black men for "suspected" crimes, a jury trial certainly sounds like welcome justice.

Not so for many in Michigan, where a 66-year-old black activist, Rev. Edward Pinkney, convicted of felony election fraud by an all-white jury, faces a life sentence, amid accusations of trumped-up charges and no direct evidence of wrongdoing.

When an all-white jury is chosen to try a prominent black community leader of an embattled, impoverished city with a 90 percent black population, when the powers that be have numerous reasons to want him discredited, and when the evidence is entirely lacking and the punishment is draconian, there is ample cause to suspect another egregious breach of justice, as blatant as refusing to indict the police who killed an unarmed teenager in Ferguson, and choked a father of six to death in Staten Island.

To be clear, there is nothing illegal about trying a black man with an all-white jury in the United States. In the 1986 Supreme Court ruling, Batson v. Kentucky, the court held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury containing or lacking members of any particular race. But in this case of activist, Reverend Edward Pinkney, his supporters believe it is equivalent to a white mob lynching an "upstart negro." .............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/27974-all-white-jury-convicts-black-community-leader-with-no-evidence-reverend-edward-pinkney-faces-life-in-prison



20 replies, 3755 views

Thread infoBookmark this threadTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 20 replies Author Time Post
Reply Convicted With No Evidence by an All-White Jury, Black Community Leader Faces Life in Prison (Original post)
 marmar Dec 2014 OP
LineReply Kick....
 daleanime Dec 2014 #1
LineReply K&R for more visibility. nt
 Mnemosyne Dec 2014 #2
LineReply Message auto-removed
 Name removed Dec 2014 #3
LineReply Seems like the juries should be of approximately the same racial
 Trillo Dec 2014 #4
LineReply This is going to have to go to the dancing Supremes, unfortunately
 Demeter Dec 2014 #5
LineReply K & R!
 LovingA2andMI Dec 2014 #6
LineReply Obama should issue a pardon.
 Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2014 #7
LineLineReply Unfortunately, he can't, since the convictions are for state, rather than federal crimes. n/t
 ColesCountyDem Dec 2014 #8
LineLineLineNew Reply Then there needs to be a civil rights case.
 Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2014 #11
LineLineLineLineNew Reply The DOJ should definitely look into the matter, if they haven't already done so.
 ColesCountyDem Dec 2014 #18
LineReply That's a distortion of Batson v Kentucky which found in favor of the defendent...
 PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #9
LineReply In Michigan, the Republicans...
 JackHughes Dec 2014 #10
LineNew Reply Interesting that in a city that's 90 percent black they managed to empanal an all-white jury.
 Shrike47 Dec 2014 #12
LineNew Reply Michigan is becoming Mississippi North
 world wide wally Dec 2014 #13
LineLineNew Reply That is the plan. Then Ohio.
 Enthusiast Dec 2014 #16
LineNew Reply interesting how he is a "black community leader"
 hfojvt Dec 2014 #14
LineLineNew Reply He certainly has a bad past, and I wouldn't want to know the guy, but a life term seems extreme.
 C Moon Dec 2014 #17
LineLineNew Reply any comments on the current case?
 noiretextatique Dec 2014 #19
LineLineLineNew Reply I am commenting on the JOURNALISM
 hfojvt Dec 2014 #20
LineNew Reply Kicked and recommended a whole bunch!
 Enthusiast Dec 2014 #15

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 10:22 AM

daleanime (17,796 posts)

1. Kick....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 10:32 AM

Mnemosyne (21,363 posts)

2. K&R for more visibility. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Name removed Message auto-removed

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 11:22 AM

Trillo (9,154 posts)

4. Seems like the juries should be of approximately the same racial

makeup as the community. This is highly reminiscent of Ferguson, where a mostly white-run and white-policed town is composed of a majority of black citizens. There should have been at least a few black folks on the jury, 2 or three minimum. Their views would be highly important to the jury discussion process, as it appears their life experience is so different.

Perhaps that 1986 Supreme Court decision should be revisited, perhaps Rev Pinkney will be the particular case.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 11:23 AM

Demeter (85,373 posts)

5. This is going to have to go to the dancing Supremes, unfortunately

 

I have my doubts as to whether they will be any more "judicial" than the whackos we have in Michigan.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 11:51 AM

Star Member LovingA2andMI (6,847 posts)

6. K & R!

Kicking because we KNOW Rev. Pinkney and he is a GOOD MAN. This is a unjust and questionable verdict at best. Rev. Pinkney was FIRST to stand against Michigan's Emergency Management Law and Michiganders believing in Democracy need to stand with him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 11:56 AM

Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)

7. Obama should issue a pardon.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #7)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 12:00 PM

ColesCountyDem (6,935 posts)

8. Unfortunately, he can't, since the convictions are for state, rather than federal crimes. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to ColesCountyDem (Reply #8)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 12:27 PM

Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)

11. Then there needs to be a civil rights case.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #11)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 01:14 PM

ColesCountyDem (6,935 posts)

18. The DOJ should definitely look into the matter, if they haven't already done so.

The legal hurdle the DOJ has to overcome is, in essence, that there be no evidence whatsoever that would support a state criminal conviction. Additionally, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the state, which is why there are few cases filed in circumstances like this present one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 12:07 PM

PoliticAverse (22,579 posts)

9. That's a distortion of Batson v Kentucky which found in favor of the defendent...

and prevents prosecutors from excluding jurors based on race.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batson_v._Kentucky

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 12:15 PM

JackHughes (152 posts)

10. In Michigan, the Republicans...

In Michigan, the Republicans treated the 2010 mid-terms not as an election but as a coup. They are using anti-democratic means -- including the literal destruction of a great American city simply because it was a Democratic stronghold -- to retain power. They will be hard to dislodge from power even after a wide majority of the state's voters reject them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 12:29 PM

Star Member Shrike47 (6,231 posts)

12. Interesting that in a city that's 90 percent black they managed to empanal an all-white jury.

Seems suspicious, doesn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 12:42 PM

Star Member world wide wally (19,719 posts)

13. Michigan is becoming Mississippi North

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to world wide wally (Reply #13)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 12:56 PM

Enthusiast (50,983 posts)

16. That is the plan. Then Ohio.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 12:44 PM

hfojvt (37,546 posts)

14. interesting how he is a "black community leader"

From his past, it sort of DOES look like he is a con man. Suddenly became a mail order reverend too. That adds to his aura of respectability.

http://www.wsbt.com/news/local/benton-harbor-social-activist-has-long-criminal-past/25782128

Considering that the mayor he is trying to recall is also black, why shouldn't a black mayor be considered a "black community leader"?

This is a tiny little suburb of 10,038 people. I find it hard to believe that the mayor of a small town like that is really one of the "powers that be". I live in a much larger city myself, of about 30,000 people and our mayor makes a salary of about $600 a month. The city manager, on the other hand, makes about $150,000 a year. And he has one year left on his term before he will be facing re-election anyway.

But that's also background on the "draconian" punishment. Pinkney has many previous felony convictions.

It's gotta be racism though when the powerful black mayor of a metropolis of 10,000 crushes a black community leader.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to hfojvt (Reply #14)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 01:06 PM

Star Member C Moon (9,260 posts)

17. He certainly has a bad past, and I wouldn't want to know the guy, but a life term seems extreme.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to hfojvt (Reply #14)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 05:20 PM

noiretextatique (27,238 posts)

19. any comments on the current case?

The one with no evidence and a life sentence?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to noiretextatique (Reply #19)

Sun Dec 14, 2014, 12:34 PM

hfojvt (37,546 posts)

20. I am commenting on the JOURNALISM

Of telling a one sided-story about RACE. Like it's a "black community leader" against "white power".

Except the "power" in this case seems to be a "black communtiy leader". A black man who was elected mayor. And how much power does a small town mayor have?

Something I found out with about five minutes worth of searching on the internet, but background that the authors of this piece chose not to discover or to present.

Is there really no evidence in this case? Or is that just what the con man and the con man's lawyers are saying?

There certainly IS not yet a life sentence. He has yet to receice a sentence, but he, and his lawyer, are already trying to work the media, work the public opinion (the refs) to reduce any possible sentence. If he does get a life sentence it will not be for THIS crime, it will be because of his OTHER felony convictions.

In the end though, he's likely to get a $500 fine, 100 hours of community service and two years of probation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to marmar (Original post)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 12:55 PM

Enthusiast (50,983 posts)

15. Kicked and recommended a whole bunch!


"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me."

—Martin Niemöller (1892-1984), a prominent Protestant pastor who emerged as an outspoken public foe of Adolf Hitler and spent the last seven years of Nazi rule in concentration camps.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread

Michigan (Group)
DU Home | Latest Threads | Greatest Threads | Forums & Groups | My Subscriptions | My Posts

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2021 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.