Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wellstone dem

(4,460 posts)
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:01 PM Feb 2012

Occupy vs. Little Falls

"Robin Hensel says it’s only fair that since the city of Little Falls ordered her to take down signs in her yard supporting the Occupy Wall Street and peace movements, the city should have to remove its “We Support Our Troops” banner from a downtown bank.

She says the issue is not what her signs or the banner say — it’s about the Central Minnesota city following its own ordinance. She says her freedom of free speech has been violated, and that she has received death threats over the Internet on the issue.

Hensel said that she was barred from keeping the signs in her yard because they violated a city signage ordinance. She said the banner on the American National Bank building also violates it. She said the banner should have a permit, but it doesn’t, and it’s bigger than allowed by the ordinance."

http://www.sctimes.com/article/20120208/NEWS01/102080033/Dispute-over-signs-roils-residents-Little-Falls?odyssey=tab

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Occupy vs. Little Falls (Original Post) wellstone dem Feb 2012 OP
Yup. It is an ugly sign also. I think she should have a sign the same size on her house or yard. glinda Feb 2012 #1

glinda

(14,807 posts)
1. Yup. It is an ugly sign also. I think she should have a sign the same size on her house or yard.
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 12:27 AM
Feb 2012

LF is a sad sad conservative area. To receive death threats is very bad.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Minnesota»Occupy vs. Little Falls