Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 10:19 AM Mar 2014

North Carolina: Lawyer Hired to Represent Agency in Spill Inquiry Once Worked for Duke Energy

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/25/us/north-carolina-lawyer-hired-to-represent-agency-in-spill-inquiry-once-worked-for-duke-energy.html

The lawyer hired to represent North Carolina’s environmental agency during a federal investigation into its regulation of Duke Energy’s coal ash dumps once represented the utility company in a different criminal inquiry. The State Department of Environment and Natural Resources hired the lawyer, Mark T. Calloway of Charlotte, to help respond to 20 grand jury subpoenas the agency has received after the Feb. 2 spill at the Eden plant of Duke Energy, which coated 70 miles of the Dan River in toxic sludge.

A former federal prosecutor who now specializes in white-collar criminal defense cases, Mr. Calloway represented Duke Energy during a 2004 federal investigation into the company’s accounting practices. An environmental agency spokesman, Drew Elliot, said Monday that he saw no conflict of interest.



Why is NC's envirnomental agency lawyering up? And why choose this guy?
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Carolina: Lawyer Hired to Represent Agency in Spill Inquiry Once Worked for Duke Energy (Original Post) Scuba Mar 2014 OP
No conflict there! JohnRogan Mar 2014 #1
Why choose this guy? Maybe because it's his area of expertise? Shrike47 Mar 2014 #2
"no conflict of interest." Triana Mar 2014 #3

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
2. Why choose this guy? Maybe because it's his area of expertise?
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 11:35 AM
Mar 2014

I have represented clients on both sides of several issues over the decades because those are the issues where I really know the law. Not to say that's why this attorney was chosen, but it happens.

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
3. "no conflict of interest."
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 12:00 PM
Mar 2014

Riiiiiight.



As Mom would say: "They've got it all sewed up."

Bastards.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»North Carolina»North Carolina: Lawyer Hi...