Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search


(15,190 posts)
Thu Jan 5, 2017, 07:47 AM Jan 2017

Corman's 2017-18 budget priorites

Jake Corman, the senate majority leader, lays out his plans for the budget.


There are some ideas here, like prison reform, that I agree with and I'm sure Gov Wolf does, too, but the big enchilada is "pension reform". I actually do think that a pension system that allows beneficiaries to withdraw their entire contributions and still receive a pension does need some tweaking because there is no defined benefit system of which I am aware that allows you to be both in and out. I was amazed when I read that Ridge and Rendell among others were able to take a lump sum pension withdrawal and still get around 1,000/mo state pension.

Corman's 2017-18 budget priorites (Original Post) DeminPennswoods Jan 2017 OP
I am a school teacher in PA wcast Jan 2017 #1
Interesting DeminPennswoods Jan 2017 #2


(595 posts)
1. I am a school teacher in PA
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 07:41 PM
Jan 2017

While I know that the pension problem was created under Ridge along with state republicans underfunding the plan for years, I wouldn't be against leaving my contributions in the system after retirement. That said, I know you get less of a pension if you take your contributions so I really don't know how much that impacts the pension deficit.


(15,190 posts)
2. Interesting
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 06:59 AM
Jan 2017

I have teachers in the family here in PA and I don't think any of them ever withdrew their contributions before collecting a pension. The reason pensions can continue to pay out is that employee/employer contributions are pooled and invested to provide enough returns, along with current employee/er contritubtions, to pay benefits. There is just no way a pension system can survive if everyone opts to withdraw their contribution and still collect a pension. It's nonsensical.

I'm part of the pre-Reagan federal civil service retirement system. Had I withdrawn my contributions, I wouldn't be getting a pension today. I know in private industry pensions, you can take either a lump sum or a pension, but not both.

I know that school boards were allowed to lower their contributions in the 90s because PSERS was actually over 100% fully funded and many of them did. Of course understanding the stock market goes both up and down didn't seem to factor into any decisions made back then.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Corman's 2017-18 budget p...