Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

white cloud

(2,567 posts)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 11:27 AM Jan 2012

Hightower: By axing parks, politicians are stealing the people's property

Check out the robbery in my state of Texas. Things tend to be bigger here — bigger hair and hats, for example, bigger money and egos ... and bigger thievery by political con men.

Last year, the gang of GOP hucksters who control our state government pulled off a huge heist, covering it up with an equally huge boast: “We balanced our budget. Not by raising taxes but by setting priorities and cutting government spending,” bragged the gang leader, Gov. Rick “Oops” Perry. How’d they fill the $27 billion shortfall that they themselves had created by their previous budgetary mismanagement? By stealing money from already poorly funded programs — from education to parks — that ordinary Texans count on.

People here are justly proud of their 94 parks, but many of these treasures are now understaffed, open fewer hours and in disrepair because the system’s budget was whacked by 21.5 percent in order to spare the wealthiest families and corporations in this enormously rich state from paying a teensy bit more in taxes.

But that was only part of the robbery. A state sales tax on sporting goods, dedicated by law to help finance the people’s parks will generate about $236 million this year and next. But the governor and his legislative henchmen raided this pile of revenue, filching two-thirds of it for the state’s general fund so they could claim that they “balanced our budget (without) raising taxes.”

To replenish some of the tax money taken by The Perry Gang, the head of parks for the Great State of Texas is now engaged in a shocking spectacle: public begging.
http://lubbockonline.com/editorial-columnists/2012-01-28/hightower-axing-parks-politicians-are-stealing-peoples-property






I beleive the state is also losing federal matching money from Pittman-Roberts federal exicise tax Act

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hightower: By axing parks, politicians are stealing the people's property (Original Post) white cloud Jan 2012 OP
k & r snagglepuss Jan 2012 #1
I've visited many parks in Texas but you pose an interesting, unstated question. Are state parks jody Jan 2012 #2
I think it's a balance of both objectives sonias Jan 2012 #4
"sacrificing parks in order to keep the tax-dodging moneyed elites" sonias Jan 2012 #3
 

jody

(26,624 posts)
2. I've visited many parks in Texas but you pose an interesting, unstated question. Are state parks
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 12:09 PM
Jan 2012

suppose to entertain people and provide all the creature comforts for humans OR are they supposed to preserve nature so we humans who trespass there for a brief time can enjoy its beauty?

sonias

(18,063 posts)
4. I think it's a balance of both objectives
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 02:02 PM
Jan 2012

Public parks provide a public space where people can go enjoy the beauty of the outdoors without private ownership i.e. you don't have to maintain it yourself. We as the public own it collectively, to enjoy collectively and to contribute to the maintenance and upkeep collectively. All for the public good. It's good for people to get outdoors and have nice open spaces to enjoy - whether we're going on walks, hikes or bike rides, camping or having a family birthday party/picnic. Whatever keeps you sane in the rat race world. Enjoy the great outdoors - it's worth keeping more of our population sane. Mini vacations for those who can not really afford to travel and have the expense of hotels etc. The most human creature comforts we should expect would be a cabin. I would nix any possibility of TV. But running water and electricity don't bother me at parks. And plenty of people still opt for pitching a tent.

The monies provided by entrance/ use fees and dedicated budget support (taxes) help keep those spaces from being developed. And in some cases completely wild and protected. A lot of parks have areas that are totally off limits to humans. And the only way they can continue that protection is to charge sufficient money on the areas where humans are allowed to cover the protection of the undeveloped parts. Otherwise the legislative robber-barons would quickly sell off the asset to some scum bag developer to make gated communities for the really rich. They feel entitled to keep the scenic views and natural treasures of this land totally to themselves.

sonias

(18,063 posts)
3. "sacrificing parks in order to keep the tax-dodging moneyed elites"
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 01:50 PM
Jan 2012
Yet so many spiritually shriveled, small-minded and short-sighted state officials are snuffing out this invaluable, uniting social force. They are stupidly treating parks as nothing but a budget number or a piece of the “nanny state” to be axed in the name of ideological purity.

Worse, they are sacrificing parks in order to keep the tax-dodging moneyed elites who pay for their campaigns from paying even a dime more in taxes.


That's it in a nutshell. I can just hear the Dickens Scrooge character (aka tax-dodging moneyed elites) talking

Ebenezer: Are there no prisons?
First Collector: Plenty of prisons.
Ebenezer: And the union workhouses - are they still in operation?
First Collector: They are. I wish I could say they were not.
Ebenezer: Oh, from what you said at first I was afraid that something had happened to stop them in their useful course. I'm very glad to hear it.


Why should the moneyed elites pay to keep public parks in operation. They would never visit one to save their life! Bah humbug!
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Hightower: By axing parks...