Washington
Related: About this forumBurbank: What are we getting out of Boeings tax breaks?
As a young girl, my daughter had a fear of flying. She overcame this through a thorough study of airplanes and landed on the 737 as her preferred means of transportation in the air. So naturally, she asked for a Boeing T-shirt for a present. It says, If its not Boeing, Im not going!
So lets talk about Boeing. You might expect that Boeing would treat Everett as the jewel in the crown of its operations. That is certainly what the Boeing management led legislators and the governor to believe when the company demanded first a $3.2 billion tax concession from the state, and then another $8.7 billion.
What did this recent tax giveaway to Boeing get us? A loss of close to 12,000 jobs, 15 percent of the total Boeing workforce in our state. That means that the state gave Boeing about $138,000 for every single job they took away!
Boeing just heralded its new 787-10, built in South Carolina. This was the first Boeing jet to make its first flight outside of Puget Sound. The company is forecasting that production of the earlier 787 models may slow down. Where will the planes not be built? Well, naturally, not in Boeings old home of Washington. That tax money we gave them? It just finances outsourcing of jobs and investment to other states and countries.
Boeing is spending billions of dollars in South Carolina and not in our state just to stick it to the unionized workers, the machinists and the engineers, in our state. There is no other reason, financial or otherwise, to forsake decades of investment in plant and workers. Remember how all this got started: Boeing took over McDonnell Douglas in 1997, but actually the McDonnell Douglas management took over Boeing. Right away, they went looking for a new Boeing corporate headquarters, not in Seattle.
The guy who oversaw this flight from and fleecing of our state was Harry Stonecipher. He dreamed up outsourcing the 787 to Japan, Italy, South Carolina and other places, which resulted in billions of dollars of cost overruns when the quality of this outsourcing was not good enough to fly safely in the new airplane.
As Jim Albaugh, chief of Commercial Airplanes at Boeing, explained in January 2011, We spent a lot more money in trying to recover than we ever would have spent if wed tried to keep the key technologies closer to home. But Stonecipher was not fired for his mismanagement of Boeing, he was fired for his mismanagement of his personal life after it came out he was having an affair with another Boeing manager.
http://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/burbank-what-are-we-getting-out-of-boeings-tax-breaks/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=d62b7945ec-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-d62b7945ec-228635337
KT2000
(20,596 posts)theft from the residents of Washington. Why are there never clauses that hold Boeing accountable for what they promise? I just don't get it.
pscot
(21,024 posts)could probably make some hay with this. Boeing is welshing on its agreement with the state.