(WI) 4/11 - JUST THE FACTS, MA'AM: WI...

[itsrigged]

Has this been resolved yet? Where does the FBI stand on this? Is this part of the John Doe investigation?
Inquiring minds would like to know...
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/8/81631.html?1302494155

[dragonlady]

1. What did you want to know?

David Prosser was named the winner shortly after election day when the vote totals from Waukesha County were amended. There was a recount of all counties without charge to JoAnne Kloppenburg, because the margin between them was so small. The recount showed no significant differences from the final totals. (This year JoAnne Kloppenburg was elected to a seat on the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, so her talents will be used one level below the Supreme Court.)

[itsrigged]

2. it's not what I want to know, is's what I know...

Arguments over procedure are what probably lead to Prossor the choker getting physical. Why do you think Walker and his minions wanted to rush the open meetings violation ruling up to the high court before the elections if not the for the fear that they stood to lose the election and have their union busting overturned. Why did they not go through the Appellate court of appeals and side step that process if not to avoid delay and have a high ruling before the election just in case they lost… and, maybe the reason for the late turn in of 14,000 votes was because they did lose but did not want to and had 24 hours to come up with the needed votes in the event there was a recount such that their ass would be covered notwithstanding, covered up by fraud…

The recount was conducted by the fox that not only guards the chickens, but the same fox dictated and oversaw the procedure as to how that recount would take place making sure fraud would not be discovered... anything else you would like to know ask the fox or ask yourself how Walker managed to hire Wackenhut and hire a criminal to oversee the security of the Milwaukee court house... thus in Walkers mind, the John Doe investigation is limited to what he did in Milwaukee when aids of his were doing something they shouldn’t of while on the tax payers dime... something he claims he had no part or hand in...

That is because Walker although his new position gives him limited powers but more than he had before is not all that bright as a college drop out and is just smart enough to get himself into more trouble. He is a con artist that crisscrossed not only the state on the tax payers dime but the country asking for support to save his ass in the recall as he was smart enough to know he was in trouble and that his ass was in a sling...

How do you think he won in a state with over 70% against him unless the voting machines got infected with some of that Koch Money and corporate shills riding into this state on bussed that set off on a mission? Which probably included a stop at a strip mall in Minnesota to drop off an uncertified update version to “fix” a problem Walker had by fixing a few machines here and there throughout the state…

Nothing happens in politics that is not planned… like that bogus poll that GOP institute kept conducting and telling us just after Scott Walker pulled another stunt and used som Koch money to air a political snippet that implied that one of those polls showed it was 50-50 between him and Tom before the primary so as to manifest it into a reality putting the screws to Kathleen Falk …

Since that worked so well, they stated playing with the poll figures to bamboozle the tax payers into believing there was a fiscal crisis and that it was mainly due to all the perks state workers were getting that the private sector was not thus pitting the private against the public workers in a divide and conquer strategy…

I believe that since voting machines can be programmed to percentage and to convert votes cast on a touch screen such that it will flip any amount necessary to give a chosen desirable whom the programmers want to win any point spread, that to lesson the suspicion of that occurring, they would prime the pump by continually announcing poll statistics that indicated Scott Walker leading his opponent by a 6 point spread… point referring to a percentage spread of 6 points… that way, if the machines tallied that kind of win for walker, the public might be more likely to accept the results for having been brain washed by all those advertisements all that out of state money paid for.

Why would a voting machine vender offer a two for one free exchange? Or, did someone else pay them other than those who received the machines and , what would be the reason if not to get something in return… now if it were a video poker gaming device going into a bar, I could understand why a vender would offer to supply them freely since the money is to be split 50:50 of what is left after any payouts… 50% for the bar and 50% for the vender… do you really think the venders that supply voting machines are in it for the one time sale with no residual benefits that might come from super pacs now that the court ruled accepting that kind of money presents no recourse for the other side to have any means to address should they ever find out what is really going on?

That is, the voting machines that were given away freely as an exchange for ones that were working before which the county officials had agreed to pay for after a sales rep from that PO box out of state third party vender operating in a strip mall sold them a pig and a poke or what is known as a bill of goods like unto a lemon… with instruction to "ask us" if you have any questions or call us if you have a problem or it stops working and we will slip a card into it as we were instructed and rebut it to fix the election...i mean problem…