Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 12:33 PM Sep 2012

Wisconsin Attorney General Van Hollen gets denied on inflicting Walker’s unconstitutional Voter I.D.

law on Wisconsin voters


VOTER ID CASE UPDATE: JUDGE FLANAGAN DENIES ATTORNEY GENERAL’S MOTION TO STAY PERMANENT INJUNCTION
September 17, 2012

On September 14, 2012 Judge Flanagan issued an Order denying Attorney General Van Hollen’s Motion for a Stay of the Permanent Injunction issued on July 17. While Judge Flanagan’s denial of the request for a stay does not impair or otherwise affect the Attorney General’s Motion to Bypass the Court of Appeals and obtain a Stay from the Wisconsin Supreme Court, the language in Judge Flanagan’s Order provides clear caution for the Supreme Court with respect to the disruptive impact a stay of the injunction would now have on the electoral process for the November elections, stating that "the inescapable reality is that the need for stability, predictability and adequate preparation for the electoral process strongly weighs against this court granting a stay and thus changing the voting process at this late hour." Judge Flanagan again cogently explained why he was not bound by the Supreme Court decision upholding the Indiana photo ID law in Crawford, and also refuted Van Hollen’s claim that the injunction would cause harm, holding that we, the plaintiffs, had presented "credible, compelling evidence that Wisconsin Act 23 [photo ID], while intended to protect the integrity of the process, had the effect of impeding, that is, making more difficult and inconvenient, the voting access of more than 300,000 citizens of Wisconsin" while "by contrast, no evidence whatsoever was offered at trial to suggest that there exists any problem of voter impersonation that would be addressed by this requirement."

http://www.hq-law.com/news/1/4678882815582900551/All/voter-id-case-update-judge-flanagan.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wisconsin Attorney General Van Hollen gets denied on inflicting Walker’s unconstitutional Voter I.D. (Original Post) midnight Sep 2012 OP
Thank you Judge Flanagan. Now if we can just get van Hollen behind bars where he belongs. Scuba Sep 2012 #1
Well-reasoned.. ewagner Sep 2012 #2
Aw, Ed, that's a stretch. Jackpine Radical Sep 2012 #3
Absentee ballots have been printed and are being sent out dragonlady Sep 2012 #4
FanFreakingTastic! Thanks midnight! Cha Sep 2012 #5
K&R Sonney2020 Sep 2012 #6

dragonlady

(3,577 posts)
4. Absentee ballots have been printed and are being sent out
Tue Sep 25, 2012, 01:44 PM
Sep 2012

It's far too late to change back to requiring voter IDs. That would create two different classes of voters--those who sent back their absentee ballots without copies of ID, and those at the polls who were required to show them. A clear denial of equal protection.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wisconsin»Wisconsin Attorney Genera...