Wisconsin
Related: About this forumWisconsin: Mary Burke's OK with the iron mine, just don't rush it
Not good enough. We need to find a candidate that will represent the will of the People, not a wolf in sheep's clothing.
http://news.wpr.org/post/mary-burke-says-shes-open-iron-mine-not-fast-track-legislation
Mary Burke was in Superior, Ashland and Bayfield over the weekend as part of her state campaign tour. She says she got an earful about mining. People are concerned about whether we are risking the sustainability and natural resources that are such assets to the state without the needed protections, Burke said. People are concerned about jobs, and want to make sure we do have good paying jobs, but also want to make sure that that's balanced with protecting our resources, which are important for not only this generation but generations to come.
Burke says she's still looking into the issue and thinks mining can happen, but only under certain circumstances, not those set by the Republican legislation. If the conditions are right, we should be looking at opportunities that are going to create jobs, but we make sure we are protecting our natural resources.
While in Ashland, Burke didn't meet with Bad River tribal officials, who are among the leading opponents of the mine, but she says she'd like to do that. She says it's important to meet with people who would be affected by an iron ore mine.
postulater
(5,075 posts)If she was in northern Wisconsin and DIDN'T prioritize a visit to Bad River she is not in touch.
The mine is THE issue. And the Bad River are THE people most affected.
Nope. Not good enough.
hue
(4,949 posts)Burke made a big mistake in not recognizing them and relating with them as a priority! One of my very favorite Youtubes!!
postulater
(5,075 posts)I'll be sharing it.
dragonlady
(3,577 posts)Contrast that with what Kathleen Vinehout said last night about the frac sand mining in her district: Her supporters have photographed all the Texas license plates on the vehicles of workers. No, it's not going to create many jobs for Wisconsin residents, but will decimate the tourist industry, apart from damage to Native American rights.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)the tourists have supported the region for years and now they will find another state to spend their money and build their cabins. once again the native american rights have been violated and they'll be forced to move.
hue
(4,949 posts)those who use workers & subject them to mesothelioma etc.
Of course I'll never support her in any way.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)if it`s good enough for the people and their environment in northern wisconsin it should be good enough for her.