Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
United Kingdom
Related: About this forumRoyals start another suit
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19608872The BBC report says its not a precedent. Where ever will be the line between privacy and the political or ceremonial position you hold?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1884 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Royals start another suit (Original Post)
Jeneral2885
Sep 2012
OP
Non consensual voyeurism is a criminal offence in the UK under S67 Sexual Offences Act 2003
fedsron2us
Sep 2012
#3
rfranklin
(13,200 posts)1. A birthday suit suit?
In Harry's case it was no big deal.
haha
fedsron2us
(2,863 posts)3. Non consensual voyeurism is a criminal offence in the UK under S67 Sexual Offences Act 2003
so while the photographs were taken abroad I think the press in the UK are not going to be publishing them any time soon. Indeed, it would probably be advisable for anyone associated with the foreign papers involved in circulating the photographs not to visit the UK any time soon as they could wind up in the slammer as accessories after the fact.
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/s67__voyeurism/
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)4. Gives a whole new meaning to
"who you looking at"