Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DLCWIdem

(1,511 posts)
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 05:20 PM Jul 2016

Does anyone know what Marc Cuban said about Hilary's speeches on the trail this weekend.

In addition to calling Trump a jag off he defended her Wall Street speeches. I just want to know his take since my defense doesn't convince anyone. I just say she was a private citizen and was entitled to make a living.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does anyone know what Marc Cuban said about Hilary's speeches on the trail this weekend. (Original Post) DLCWIdem Jul 2016 OP
Lots of times I say what Hillary said. It is what they offered. riversedge Jul 2016 #1
thank you DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #3
Okay, people who are important get to make money giving talks ladym55 Jul 2016 #2
thank you DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #4
If we want Wall Street to play by new rules Ellen Forradalom Jul 2016 #5
excellent response! SharonClark Jul 2016 #6
You are certainly right about that--there is a different standard for Hillary--somehow it is a sin riversedge Aug 2016 #7
One thing that I think that many people don't get is that the main reason that companies... Princess Turandot Aug 2016 #8

ladym55

(2,577 posts)
2. Okay, people who are important get to make money giving talks
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 05:55 PM
Jul 2016

It doesn't make them "beholden" to the venue. Someone as important as Hillary makes a really big fee when she speaks. Lesser known writers make $20K for a talk (plus expenses), and I forget what the members of the cast of Jersey Shore commanded to "speak" to an audience.

This is just another case of one standard for Hillary and a different standard for EVERYONE else represented by the Speakers Bureau.

DLCWIdem

(1,511 posts)
4. thank you
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 05:59 PM
Jul 2016

Last edited Sun Jul 31, 2016, 06:49 PM - Edit history (1)

Damn that's good. Gives me some ideas to be more effective with the question. Maybe something like this. I imagine the speaking fees on the lecture circuit are equal to the qualifications of the speaker. What you have here is an ex first lady, an active one going to Beijing conference, an ex Senator from New York and an ex Sec of State. So these qualifications allow her to command larger speaking fees. Just like I'm sure E. Warren had a salary but if she ever leaves the senate I imagine her speaking fees at Harvard if she ever went back to lecture would probably be 2-3x what they were when she was only a professor.


Ellen Forradalom

(16,159 posts)
5. If we want Wall Street to play by new rules
Sun Jul 31, 2016, 06:40 PM
Jul 2016

then it's good to have those relationships in place.

Occupy expressed discontent but Hillary will have the power to make things move

riversedge

(69,302 posts)
7. You are certainly right about that--there is a different standard for Hillary--somehow it is a sin
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 02:28 AM
Aug 2016

for her to make money.

Princess Turandot

(4,783 posts)
8. One thing that I think that many people don't get is that the main reason that companies...
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 03:06 PM
Aug 2016

like Goldman bring in these high-profile speakers is for their own marketing/public relations, both internal and external. It's a perk to their employees to get to hear the famous person speak, and it's a draw to potential clients to use a firm that does things like this, even if they themselves don't hear the speech. Clients are obviously important to companies, but so are very competent professional staff are as well, and these types of things are a lure to them. The speakers are there to engage, or entertain, or inform, not share top secret info with them or act as consultants.

Hillary is one of the best known individuals in our 7 billion population: given her experience, it should be a surprise to no one that many companies would be thrilled to have her as a speaker. If they were willing to pay a large amount of money for some famous male to speak to them, why shouldn't one of the world's most famous women be paid as much as him, if not more? Would it be wrong for Serena Williams to be paid more than Michael Phelps to give a speech? If they thought her stated fee was too much for them, they would have looked for someone else: it's not like they were being blackmailed by anyone. And as you said, she was a private citizen.

Leaving aside the bad actors who obsess about this merely as an attack on her, one of the difficulties that some people likely have about this is that they see these large dollars involved and can't conceive of someone paying that much money without an ulterior motive. But for the companies that hire such speakers, the money spent is actually not significant.

Regarding Cuban, here's a link to his speech. He's the first speaker, and goes for about 15 minutes. I jumped around it a little, but didn't hear a reference to the speeches.


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Does anyone know what Mar...