Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumNew Christy Romer memo shreds Sanders' claims on economic growth
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/25/1491522/-New-Christy-Romer-memo-shreds-Sanders-claims-on-economic-growthBy andrewj54
Christy Romer, formerly of the Council of Economic Advisors, and David Romer, have provided a response to those defending the growth claims embedded in Sanders policies. Its eleven pages of what looks to me like rigorous economic analysis.
From the opening of the memo:
Unfortunately, careful examination of Friedmans work confirms the old adage, if something seems too good to be true, it probably is. We identify three fundamental problems in Friedmans analysis.
First, all the effects of Senator Sanderss policies that he identifies are assumed to come through their impact on demand. However, his estimates of those demand effects are far too large to be credibleeven given Friedmans own assumptions.
Second, in assuming that demand stimulus can raise output 37% over the next 10 years relative to the Congressional Budget Offices baseline forecast, Friedman is implicitly assuming that the U.S. economy is (and will continue to be for a long time) dramatically below its productive capacity. However, while some output gap likely still exists, the plausible range for the output gap is much too small to accommodate demand effects nearly as large as Friedman finds. As a result, capacity constraints would likely lead to inflation and the Federal Reserve raising interest rates long before such high growth rates were realized.
Third, a realistic examination of the impact of the Sanders policies on the economys productive capacity suggests those effects are likely to be small at best, and possibly even negative.
(More in link)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1065 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Christy Romer memo shreds Sanders' claims on economic growth (Original Post)
MrWendel
Feb 2016
OP
I doubt the figures delivered by Sanders, they don't add up. The reasoning of
Thinkingabout
Feb 2016
#1
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)1. I doubt the figures delivered by Sanders, they don't add up. The reasoning of
Saying the programs are working in other countries but not including the negative sides of the programs is giving a drug saying it will help something improve without giving the side effects is not always successful. Many likes capitalism and are willing to work hard to maintain ourselves.
comradebillyboy
(10,155 posts)2. Bernie's economic numbers are just as good a Paul Ryan's
but neither have any relationship to the real world.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)3. Fuzzy math is still alive
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)4. Programs of the magnitude Bernie wants haven't ever been tried anywhere
They also come with far higher taxation than the American people will stomach.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)6. Myself included. in some countries there are those who feel entitled,
I don't like that.