Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Polls from Ohio, Missouri, Illinois, Florida & N Carolina (Original Post) Fla Dem Mar 2016 OP
I heard people in Ohio, democrats, are switching to R so they can vote for Kasich Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #1
That says to me romana Mar 2016 #3
Yes, party switching can be a dangerous and foolish tactic. Fla Dem Mar 2016 #5
Exactly. My brother in Michigan had repub friends who were doing just this. anotherproletariat Mar 2016 #9
I actually think this might help us in Ohio overall MSMITH33156 Mar 2016 #7
makes sense! Her Sister Mar 2016 #19
I predict Hillary wins delegate count big and popular vote tonight pkdu Mar 2016 #2
The BSers will claim fraud in any state they don't win liberal N proud Mar 2016 #6
Oh yeah shenmue Mar 2016 #8
DUCK! fleabiscuit Mar 2016 #12
Right! Because Diebold is in the tank for Hillary bluestateguy Mar 2016 #20
Thanks for posting this! pandr32 Mar 2016 #4
I think I'm going to have to steal that dance. :-) fleabiscuit Mar 2016 #11
Great! We will be dancing together!!! pandr32 Mar 2016 #15
I think we could narrowly lose Missouri and Indiana. Fla Dem Mar 2016 #14
60-75% is worthy of lots of dancing! pandr32 Mar 2016 #16
Looks like a good chance for a HRC sweep of the day. fleabiscuit Mar 2016 #10
Very interesting MSMITH33156 Mar 2016 #13
Possible! Treant Mar 2016 #17
I'll be dancing right along with you! Fla Dem Mar 2016 #18
How is turnout in consciouslocs Mar 2016 #21

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
1. I heard people in Ohio, democrats, are switching to R so they can vote for Kasich
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:07 PM
Mar 2016

or against Trump.

The theory being that Kasich can win there, as it is his state.

I dont have stats or links, just something I have heard.

I dont like that for two reasons, I think they should be voting for their candidate and I thought we could do better against Trump in the general, Kasich is dangerous and he is very rightwing.

The one person I heard say this was a Hillary supporter, which makes even less sense to me as the race is relatively close there with Bernie, right?

romana

(765 posts)
3. That says to me
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:13 PM
Mar 2016

That says to me that when you get right down to it, people don't really see much of a difference between Clinton and Sanders, despite all the bluster about how they are night and day.

Fla Dem

(23,666 posts)
5. Yes, party switching can be a dangerous and foolish tactic.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:14 PM
Mar 2016

Your "real" candidate may need all the votes they can get. To try and finagle the results can backfire. I also heard in other open primary states, Republicans were voting for BS because they saw him as the easier candidate to beat; which could explain Bernies narrow win in Michigan.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
9. Exactly. My brother in Michigan had repub friends who were doing just this.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:43 PM
Mar 2016

They really want to run against BS because they think they can beat him much more easily. Remember, even though polls show Sanders ahead of various repub candidates, he has not been on the receiving end of ANY negative ads. There are many, many possible avenues for attack against him, and those polls will change rapidly.

MSMITH33156

(879 posts)
7. I actually think this might help us in Ohio overall
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:29 PM
Mar 2016

There might be some Democratic crossover, but I'm hoping a majority of independents choose to vote in the Republican primary as a pro-Kashich/anti-Trump move.

Among Democratic voters, Hillary whips Bernie. Even in states she loses. For example, in Michigan, she won 59% of the Democratic vote.

So, while there might be some Democratic crossover, and that could cannibalize her vote, stands to reason there would be a lot more independents choosing to vote for the native son on the Republican side, which helps us.

pkdu

(3,977 posts)
2. I predict Hillary wins delegate count big and popular vote tonight
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:11 PM
Mar 2016

450-200 or so on delegates ...and Sanders crew will say "its a moral victory" and "the rest of the states are all ours"

pandr32

(11,582 posts)
4. Thanks for posting this!
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:14 PM
Mar 2016

Looking good! What a day--hopefully I will be able to do my version of the end zone dance several times!

Fla Dem

(23,666 posts)
14. I think we could narrowly lose Missouri and Indiana.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 01:00 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Tue Mar 15, 2016, 01:53 PM - Edit history (1)

But HRC wins big in Florida and NC, narrow win in Illnois. As all are proportional delegate states, I think HRC will pick up 60-75% of the total delegates. Total available 792: HRC 475-594.


MSMITH33156

(879 posts)
13. Very interesting
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:57 PM
Mar 2016

I'd tend to more favor the demographic model because of Michigan, but in either case, I think the headline is I'd much rather be us than them.

Treant

(1,968 posts)
17. Possible!
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 01:37 PM
Mar 2016

I still only credit her with 3 out of 5 because I hate being disappointed. If it ends up being 5-0 in her favor you'll hear me tap dancing from several states away.

And I can't tap dance, so you might want to wear ear muffs.

consciouslocs

(43 posts)
21. How is turnout in
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 03:45 PM
Mar 2016

Ohio? Most of the crossover voting reports appears to be people who have been registered Democrats, but voting Republican prior to this election. I think the Mayor in Chicago might hurt her chances, unless she does better outside of the city.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Polls from Ohio, Missouri...